From d1e727da0ed0a57edbc5d9d1da5b080f7b59f17b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeff Trawick Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 20:59:15 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] hot hot hot git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/APACHE_2_0_BRANCH@100364 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 --- STATUS | 11 ++++++++++- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/STATUS b/STATUS index b04c05655c8..784591fb8e3 100644 --- a/STATUS +++ b/STATUS @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*- -Last modified at [$Date: 2003/06/25 20:22:15 $] +Last modified at [$Date: 2003/06/25 20:59:15 $] Release: @@ -219,6 +219,15 @@ PATCHES TO PORT FROM 2.1 modules/http/http_protocol.c 1.470 jerenkrantz: When it is a proxy response that doesn't have server string set, we shouldn't place one there. Correct? + trawick: rfc2616/14.38: "The Server response-header field contains + information about the software used by the origin server + to handle the request." ... "If the response is being + forwarded through a proxy, the proxy application MUST NOT + modify the Server response-header." + I don't see any wiggle room for us to be adding one if + the origin server didn't include it. + BTW, with my patch Apache 2 and Apache 1.3 will behave + identically. (That's how I read the code, anyway :) ) +1: trawick * mod_rewrite: Perform child initialization on the rewrite log -- 2.47.3