From ef15641fb54b45255c167c8b02ea0ed47496b85d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Anna Czarnowska <anna.czarnowska@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 14:31:15 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Monitor: array that has disappeared doesn't need spares

If a degraded array disappears we still have it in statelist
with active<raid but it is pointless to look for spares for it.

Signed-off-by: Anna Czarnowska <anna.czarnowska@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
---
 Monitor.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Monitor.c b/Monitor.c
index 0e916884..d5514e9c 100644
--- a/Monitor.c
+++ b/Monitor.c
@@ -879,7 +879,7 @@ static void try_spare_migration(struct state *statelist, struct alert_info *info
 	link_containers_with_subarrays(statelist);
 	for (st = statelist; st; st = st->next)
 		if (st->active < st->raid &&
-		    st->spare == 0) {
+		    st->spare == 0 && !st->err) {
 			struct domainlist *domlist = NULL;
 			int d;
 			struct state *to = st;
-- 
2.39.2