From 4759383245ac97a5c83c0272f0a831f2a26ea5c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jiufu Guo Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 13:03:06 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] treat argp-based mem as frame related in dse The issue mentioned in PR112525 would be able to be handled by updating dse.cc to treat arg_pointer_rtx similarly with frame_pointer_rtx. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30271#c10 also mentioned this idea. And arpg area may be used to pass argument to callee. So, it would be needed to check if call insns are using that mem. PR rtl-optimization/112525 PR target/30271 gcc/ChangeLog: * dse.cc (get_group_info): Add arg_pointer_rtx as frame_related. (check_mem_read_rtx): Add parameter to indicate if it is checking mem for call insn. (scan_insn): Add mem checking on call usage. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.target/powerpc/pr112525.c: New test. * gcc.target/powerpc/pr30271.c: New test. --- gcc/dse.cc | 17 +++++++++++++---- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr112525.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr30271.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr112525.c create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr30271.c diff --git a/gcc/dse.cc b/gcc/dse.cc index 40c4c29d07e0..b98b47fff608 100644 --- a/gcc/dse.cc +++ b/gcc/dse.cc @@ -682,7 +682,8 @@ get_group_info (rtx base) gi->group_kill = BITMAP_ALLOC (&dse_bitmap_obstack); gi->process_globally = false; gi->frame_related = - (base == frame_pointer_rtx) || (base == hard_frame_pointer_rtx); + (base == frame_pointer_rtx) || (base == hard_frame_pointer_rtx) + || (base == arg_pointer_rtx && fixed_regs[ARG_POINTER_REGNUM]); gi->offset_map_size_n = 0; gi->offset_map_size_p = 0; gi->offset_map_n = NULL; @@ -2164,7 +2165,7 @@ replace_read (store_info *store_info, insn_info_t store_insn, be active. */ static void -check_mem_read_rtx (rtx *loc, bb_info_t bb_info) +check_mem_read_rtx (rtx *loc, bb_info_t bb_info, bool used_in_call = false) { rtx mem = *loc, mem_addr; insn_info_t insn_info; @@ -2309,7 +2310,8 @@ check_mem_read_rtx (rtx *loc, bb_info_t bb_info) stored, rewrite the read. */ else { - if (store_info->rhs + if (!used_in_call + && store_info->rhs && known_subrange_p (offset, width, store_info->offset, store_info->width) && all_positions_needed_p (store_info, @@ -2375,7 +2377,8 @@ check_mem_read_rtx (rtx *loc, bb_info_t bb_info) /* If this read is just reading back something that we just stored, rewrite the read. */ - if (store_info->rhs + if (!used_in_call + && store_info->rhs && store_info->group_id == -1 && store_info->cse_base == base && known_subrange_p (offset, width, store_info->offset, @@ -2657,6 +2660,12 @@ scan_insn (bb_info_t bb_info, rtx_insn *insn, int max_active_local_stores) that is not relative to the frame. */ add_non_frame_wild_read (bb_info); + for (rtx link = CALL_INSN_FUNCTION_USAGE (insn); + link != NULL_RTX; + link = XEXP (link, 1)) + if (GET_CODE (XEXP (link, 0)) == USE && MEM_P (XEXP (XEXP (link, 0),0))) + check_mem_read_rtx (&XEXP (XEXP (link, 0),0), bb_info, true); + return; } diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr112525.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr112525.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..428598188e7d --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr112525.c @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +/* { dg-do compile { target lp64 } } */ +/* { dg-options "-O2" } */ + +typedef struct teststruct +{ + double d; + int arr[15]; +} teststruct; + +void +foo (teststruct p) +{ +} + +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\mstd\M} } } */ diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr30271.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr30271.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..bddef039798e --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr30271.c @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +/* { dg-do compile { target lp64 } } */ +/* { dg-options "-O3 -mstrict-align" } */ + +struct SS +{ + int t, t1; +}; + +int +f (struct SS b) +{ + return b.t + b.t1; +} + +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\mstd\M} } } */ -- 2.47.2