]>
Commit | Line | Data |
---|---|---|
00e5a55c BS |
1 | From: Gerald Schaefer <geraldsc@de.ibm.com> |
2 | Subject: zfcp: Let actcli handle control file errors | |
3 | References: bnc#487755,LTC#52571 | |
4 | ||
5 | Symptom: actcli returns "No such device or address", although the | |
6 | access control tables have been updated or could be | |
7 | updated with the -F flag. | |
8 | Problem: The FCP channel reports an FSF status indicating, that | |
9 | the channel is in use or that the -F flag has been | |
10 | used. zfcp did present the "No such device.." problem for | |
11 | any error for the "control file download command" which | |
12 | is wrong. | |
13 | Solution: Don't report "No such device or address" from zfcp for | |
14 | errors specific to the "control file download command". | |
15 | ||
16 | Acked-by: John Jolly <jjolly@suse.de> | |
17 | --- | |
18 | drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c | 2 -- | |
19 | 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) | |
20 | ||
21 | --- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c 2009-04-02 16:20:24.000000000 +0200 | |
22 | +++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c 2009-04-02 16:23:30.000000000 +0200 | |
23 | @@ -2496,8 +2496,6 @@ out: | |
24 | ||
25 | static void zfcp_fsf_control_file_handler(struct zfcp_fsf_req *req) | |
26 | { | |
27 | - if (req->qtcb->header.fsf_status != FSF_GOOD) | |
28 | - req->status |= ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_ERROR; | |
29 | } | |
30 | ||
31 | /** |