# Commit B: z/{b,c,d,e/f}
# Expected: y/{b,c,d,e/f}
-test_expect_success '1a-setup: Simple directory rename detection' '
+test_setup_1a () {
test_create_repo 1a &&
(
cd 1a &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '1a-check: Simple directory rename detection' '
+test_expect_success '1a: Simple directory rename detection' '
+ test_setup_1a &&
(
cd 1a &&
# Commit B: y/{b,c,d}
# Expected: y/{b,c,d,e}
-test_expect_success '1b-setup: Merge a directory with another' '
+test_setup_1b () {
test_create_repo 1b &&
(
cd 1b &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '1b-check: Merge a directory with another' '
+test_expect_success '1b: Merge a directory with another' '
+ test_setup_1b &&
(
cd 1b &&
# Commit B: z/{b,c,d}
# Expected: y/{b,c,d} (because x/d -> z/d -> y/d)
-test_expect_success '1c-setup: Transitive renaming' '
+test_setup_1c () {
test_create_repo 1c &&
(
cd 1c &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '1c-check: Transitive renaming' '
+test_expect_success '1c: Transitive renaming' '
+ test_setup_1c &&
(
cd 1c &&
# Note: y/m & z/n should definitely move into x. By the same token, both
# y/wham_1 & z/wham_2 should too...giving us a conflict.
-test_expect_success '1d-setup: Directory renames cause a rename/rename(2to1) conflict' '
+test_setup_1d () {
test_create_repo 1d &&
(
cd 1d &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '1d-check: Directory renames cause a rename/rename(2to1) conflict' '
+test_expect_success '1d: Directory renames cause a rename/rename(2to1) conflict' '
+ test_setup_1d &&
(
cd 1d &&
# Commit B: z/{oldb,oldc,d}
# Expected: y/{newb,newc,d}
-test_expect_success '1e-setup: Renamed directory, with all files being renamed too' '
+test_setup_1e () {
test_create_repo 1e &&
(
cd 1e &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '1e-check: Renamed directory, with all files being renamed too' '
+test_expect_success '1e: Renamed directory, with all files being renamed too' '
+ test_setup_1e &&
(
cd 1e &&
# Commit B: y/{b,c}, x/{d,e,f}
# Expected: y/{b,c}, x/{d,e,f,g}
-test_expect_success '1f-setup: Split a directory into two other directories' '
+test_setup_1f () {
test_create_repo 1f &&
(
cd 1f &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '1f-check: Split a directory into two other directories' '
+test_expect_success '1f: Split a directory into two other directories' '
+ test_setup_1f &&
(
cd 1f &&
# Commit A: y/b, w/c
# Commit B: z/{b,c,d}
# Expected: y/b, w/c, z/d, with warning about z/ -> (y/ vs. w/) conflict
-test_expect_success '2a-setup: Directory split into two on one side, with equal numbers of paths' '
+test_setup_2a () {
test_create_repo 2a &&
(
cd 2a &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '2a-check: Directory split into two on one side, with equal numbers of paths' '
+test_expect_success '2a: Directory split into two on one side, with equal numbers of paths' '
+ test_setup_2a &&
(
cd 2a &&
# Commit A: y/b, w/c
# Commit B: z/{b,c}, x/d
# Expected: y/b, w/c, x/d; No warning about z/ -> (y/ vs. w/) conflict
-test_expect_success '2b-setup: Directory split into two on one side, with equal numbers of paths' '
+test_setup_2b () {
test_create_repo 2b &&
(
cd 2b &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '2b-check: Directory split into two on one side, with equal numbers of paths' '
+test_expect_success '2b: Directory split into two on one side, with equal numbers of paths' '
+ test_setup_2b &&
(
cd 2b &&
# Commit A: z/{b,c,d} (no change)
# Commit B: y/{b,c}, x/d
# Expected: y/{b,c}, x/d
-test_expect_success '3a-setup: Avoid implicit rename if involved as source on other side' '
+test_setup_3a () {
test_create_repo 3a &&
(
cd 3a &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '3a-check: Avoid implicit rename if involved as source on other side' '
+test_expect_success '3a: Avoid implicit rename if involved as source on other side' '
+ test_setup_3a &&
(
cd 3a &&
# get it involved in directory rename detection. If it were, we might
# end up with CONFLICT:(z/d -> y/d vs. x/d vs. w/d), i.e. a
# rename/rename/rename(1to3) conflict, which is just weird.
-test_expect_success '3b-setup: Avoid implicit rename if involved as source on current side' '
+test_setup_3b () {
test_create_repo 3b &&
(
cd 3b &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '3b-check: Avoid implicit rename if involved as source on current side' '
+test_expect_success '3b: Avoid implicit rename if involved as source on current side' '
+ test_setup_3b &&
(
cd 3b &&
# Expected: y/{b,c,d}, z/{e,f}
# NOTE: Even though most files from z moved to y, we don't want f to follow.
-test_expect_success '4a-setup: Directory split, with original directory still present' '
+test_setup_4a () {
test_create_repo 4a &&
(
cd 4a &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '4a-check: Directory split, with original directory still present' '
+test_expect_success '4a: Directory split, with original directory still present' '
+ test_setup_4a &&
(
cd 4a &&
# of history, giving us no way to represent this conflict in the
# index.
-test_expect_success '5a-setup: Merge directories, other side adds files to original and target' '
+test_setup_5a () {
test_create_repo 5a &&
(
cd 5a &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '5a-check: Merge directories, other side adds files to original and target' '
+test_expect_success '5a: Merge directories, other side adds files to original and target' '
+ test_setup_5a &&
(
cd 5a &&
# cause us to bail on directory rename detection for that path, falling
# back to git behavior without the directory rename detection.
-test_expect_success '5b-setup: Rename/delete in order to get add/add/add conflict' '
+test_setup_5b () {
test_create_repo 5b &&
(
cd 5b &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '5b-check: Rename/delete in order to get add/add/add conflict' '
+test_expect_success '5b: Rename/delete in order to get add/add/add conflict' '
+ test_setup_5b &&
(
cd 5b &&
# y/d are y/d_2 and y/d_4. We still do the move from z/e to y/e,
# though, because it doesn't have anything in the way.
-test_expect_success '5c-setup: Transitive rename would cause rename/rename/rename/add/add/add' '
+test_setup_5c () {
test_create_repo 5c &&
(
cd 5c &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '5c-check: Transitive rename would cause rename/rename/rename/add/add/add' '
+test_expect_success '5c: Transitive rename would cause rename/rename/rename/add/add/add' '
+ test_setup_5c &&
(
cd 5c &&
# detection for z/d_2, but that doesn't prevent us from applying the
# directory rename detection for z/f -> y/f.
-test_expect_success '5d-setup: Directory/file/file conflict due to directory rename' '
+test_setup_5d () {
test_create_repo 5d &&
(
cd 5d &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '5d-check: Directory/file/file conflict due to directory rename' '
+test_expect_success '5d: Directory/file/file conflict due to directory rename' '
+ test_setup_5d &&
(
cd 5d &&
# them under y/ doesn't accidentally catch z/d and make it look like
# it is also involved in a rename/delete conflict.
-test_expect_success '6a-setup: Tricky rename/delete' '
+test_setup_6a () {
test_create_repo 6a &&
(
cd 6a &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '6a-check: Tricky rename/delete' '
+test_expect_success '6a: Tricky rename/delete' '
+ test_setup_6a &&
(
cd 6a &&
# but B did that rename and still decided to put the file into z/,
# so we probably shouldn't apply directory rename detection for it.
-test_expect_success '6b-setup: Same rename done on both sides' '
+test_setup_6b () {
test_create_repo 6b &&
(
cd 6b &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '6b-check: Same rename done on both sides' '
+test_expect_success '6b: Same rename done on both sides' '
+ test_setup_6b &&
(
cd 6b &&
# NOTE: Seems obvious, but just checking that the implementation doesn't
# "accidentally detect a rename" and give us y/{b,c,d}.
-test_expect_success '6c-setup: Rename only done on same side' '
+test_setup_6c () {
test_create_repo 6c &&
(
cd 6c &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '6c-check: Rename only done on same side' '
+test_expect_success '6c: Rename only done on same side' '
+ test_setup_6c &&
(
cd 6c &&
# NOTE: Again, this seems obvious but just checking that the implementation
# doesn't "accidentally detect a rename" and give us y/{b,c,d}.
-test_expect_success '6d-setup: We do not always want transitive renaming' '
+test_setup_6d () {
test_create_repo 6d &&
(
cd 6d &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '6d-check: We do not always want transitive renaming' '
+test_expect_success '6d: We do not always want transitive renaming' '
+ test_setup_6d &&
(
cd 6d &&
# doesn't "accidentally detect a rename" and give us y/{b,c} +
# add/add conflict on y/d_1 vs y/d_2.
-test_expect_success '6e-setup: Add/add from one side' '
+test_setup_6e () {
test_create_repo 6e &&
(
cd 6e &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '6e-check: Add/add from one side' '
+test_expect_success '6e: Add/add from one side' '
+ test_setup_6e &&
(
cd 6e &&
# Expected: y/d, CONFLICT(rename/rename for both z/b and z/c)
# NOTE: There's a rename of z/ here, y/ has more renames, so z/d -> y/d.
-test_expect_success '7a-setup: rename-dir vs. rename-dir (NOT split evenly) PLUS add-other-file' '
+test_setup_7a () {
test_create_repo 7a &&
(
cd 7a &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '7a-check: rename-dir vs. rename-dir (NOT split evenly) PLUS add-other-file' '
+test_expect_success '7a: rename-dir vs. rename-dir (NOT split evenly) PLUS add-other-file' '
+ test_setup_7a &&
(
cd 7a &&
# Commit B: z/{b,c,d_1}, w/d_2
# Expected: y/{b,c}, CONFLICT(rename/rename(2to1): x/d_1, w/d_2 -> y_d)
-test_expect_success '7b-setup: rename/rename(2to1), but only due to transitive rename' '
+test_setup_7b () {
test_create_repo 7b &&
(
cd 7b &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '7b-check: rename/rename(2to1), but only due to transitive rename' '
+test_expect_success '7b: rename/rename(2to1), but only due to transitive rename' '
+ test_setup_7b &&
(
cd 7b &&
# neither CONFLICT(x/d -> w/d vs. z/d)
# nor CONFLiCT x/d -> w/d vs. y/d vs. z/d)
-test_expect_success '7c-setup: rename/rename(1to...2or3); transitive rename may add complexity' '
+test_setup_7c () {
test_create_repo 7c &&
(
cd 7c &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '7c-check: rename/rename(1to...2or3); transitive rename may add complexity' '
+test_expect_success '7c: rename/rename(1to...2or3); transitive rename may add complexity' '
+ test_setup_7c &&
(
cd 7c &&
# Expected: y/{b,c}, CONFLICT(delete x/d vs rename to y/d)
# NOTE: z->y so NOT CONFLICT(delete x/d vs rename to z/d)
-test_expect_success '7d-setup: transitive rename involved in rename/delete; how is it reported?' '
+test_setup_7d () {
test_create_repo 7d &&
(
cd 7d &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '7d-check: transitive rename involved in rename/delete; how is it reported?' '
+test_expect_success '7d: transitive rename involved in rename/delete; how is it reported?' '
+ test_setup_7d &&
(
cd 7d &&
# see testcases 9c and 9d for further discussion of this issue and
# how it's resolved.
-test_expect_success '7e-setup: transitive rename in rename/delete AND dirs in the way' '
+test_setup_7e () {
test_create_repo 7e &&
(
cd 7e &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '7e-check: transitive rename in rename/delete AND dirs in the way' '
+test_expect_success '7e: transitive rename in rename/delete AND dirs in the way' '
+ test_setup_7e &&
(
cd 7e &&
# simple rule from section 5 prevents me from handling this as optimally as
# we potentially could.
-test_expect_success '8a-setup: Dual-directory rename, one into the others way' '
+test_setup_8a () {
test_create_repo 8a &&
(
cd 8a &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '8a-check: Dual-directory rename, one into the others way' '
+test_expect_success '8a: Dual-directory rename, one into the others way' '
+ test_setup_8a &&
(
cd 8a &&
# making us fall back to pre-directory-rename-detection behavior for both
# e_1 and e_2.
-test_expect_success '8b-setup: Dual-directory rename, one into the others way, with conflicting filenames' '
+test_setup_8b () {
test_create_repo 8b &&
(
cd 8b &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '8b-check: Dual-directory rename, one into the others way, with conflicting filenames' '
+test_expect_success '8b: Dual-directory rename, one into the others way, with conflicting filenames' '
+ test_setup_8b &&
(
cd 8b &&
# rename/rename(1to2) conflicts -- see testcase 9h. See also
# notes in 8d.
-test_expect_success '8c-setup: modify/delete or rename+modify/delete?' '
+test_setup_8c () {
test_create_repo 8c &&
(
cd 8c &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '8c-check: modify/delete or rename+modify/delete' '
+test_expect_success '8c: modify/delete or rename+modify/delete' '
+ test_setup_8c &&
(
cd 8c &&
# during merging are supposed to be about opposite sides doing things
# differently.
-test_expect_success '8d-setup: rename/delete...or not?' '
+test_setup_8d () {
test_create_repo 8d &&
(
cd 8d &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '8d-check: rename/delete...or not?' '
+test_expect_success '8d: rename/delete...or not?' '
+ test_setup_8d &&
(
cd 8d &&
# about the ramifications of doing that, I didn't know how to rule out
# that opening other weird edge and corner cases so I just punted.
-test_expect_success '8e-setup: Both sides rename, one side adds to original directory' '
+test_setup_8e () {
test_create_repo 8e &&
(
cd 8e &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '8e-check: Both sides rename, one side adds to original directory' '
+test_expect_success '8e: Both sides rename, one side adds to original directory' '
+ test_setup_8e &&
(
cd 8e &&
# of which one had the most paths going to it. A naive implementation
# of that could take the new file in commit B at z/i to x/w/i or x/i.
-test_expect_success '9a-setup: Inner renamed directory within outer renamed directory' '
+test_setup_9a () {
test_create_repo 9a &&
(
cd 9a &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '9a-check: Inner renamed directory within outer renamed directory' '
+test_expect_success '9a: Inner renamed directory within outer renamed directory' '
+ test_setup_9a &&
(
cd 9a &&
# Commit B: z/{b,c,d_3}
# Expected: y/{b,c,d_merged}
-test_expect_success '9b-setup: Transitive rename with content merge' '
+test_setup_9b () {
test_create_repo 9b &&
(
cd 9b &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '9b-check: Transitive rename with content merge' '
+test_expect_success '9b: Transitive rename with content merge' '
+ test_setup_9b &&
(
cd 9b &&
# away, then ignore that particular rename from the other side of
# history for any implicit directory renames.
-test_expect_success '9c-setup: Doubly transitive rename?' '
+test_setup_9c () {
test_create_repo 9c &&
(
cd 9c &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '9c-check: Doubly transitive rename?' '
+test_expect_success '9c: Doubly transitive rename?' '
+ test_setup_9c &&
(
cd 9c &&
# simple rules that are consistent with what we need for all the other
# testcases and simplifies things for the user.
-test_expect_success '9d-setup: N-way transitive rename?' '
+test_setup_9d () {
test_create_repo 9d &&
(
cd 9d &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '9d-check: N-way transitive rename?' '
+test_expect_success '9d: N-way transitive rename?' '
+ test_setup_9d &&
(
cd 9d &&
# Expected: combined/{a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l}, CONFLICT(Nto1) warnings,
# dir1/yo, dir2/yo, dir3/yo, dirN/yo
-test_expect_success '9e-setup: N-to-1 whammo' '
+test_setup_9e () {
test_create_repo 9e &&
(
cd 9e &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success C_LOCALE_OUTPUT '9e-check: N-to-1 whammo' '
+test_expect_success C_LOCALE_OUTPUT '9e: N-to-1 whammo' '
+ test_setup_9e &&
(
cd 9e &&
# Commit B: goal/{a,b}/$more_files, goal/c
# Expected: priority/{a,b}/$more_files, priority/c
-test_expect_success '9f-setup: Renamed directory that only contained immediate subdirs' '
+test_setup_9f () {
test_create_repo 9f &&
(
cd 9f &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '9f-check: Renamed directory that only contained immediate subdirs' '
+test_expect_success '9f: Renamed directory that only contained immediate subdirs' '
+ test_setup_9f &&
(
cd 9f &&
# Commit B: goal/{a,b}/$more_files, goal/c
# Expected: priority/{alpha,bravo}/$more_files, priority/c
-test_expect_success '9g-setup: Renamed directory that only contained immediate subdirs, immediate subdirs renamed' '
+test_setup_9g () {
test_create_repo 9g &&
(
cd 9g &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_failure '9g-check: Renamed directory that only contained immediate subdirs, immediate subdirs renamed' '
+test_expect_failure '9g: Renamed directory that only contained immediate subdirs, immediate subdirs renamed' '
(
cd 9g &&
# Expected: y/{b,c}, x/d_2
# NOTE: If we applied the z/ -> y/ rename to z/d, then we'd end up with
# a rename/rename(1to2) conflict (z/d -> y/d vs. x/d)
-test_expect_success '9h-setup: Avoid dir rename on merely modified path' '
+test_setup_9h () {
test_create_repo 9h &&
(
cd 9h &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '9h-check: Avoid dir rename on merely modified path' '
+test_expect_success '9h: Avoid dir rename on merely modified path' '
+ test_setup_9h &&
(
cd 9h &&
# Expected: Aborted Merge +
# ERROR_MSG(untracked working tree files would be overwritten by merge)
-test_expect_success '10a-setup: Overwrite untracked with normal rename/delete' '
+test_setup_10a () {
test_create_repo 10a &&
(
cd 10a &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '10a-check: Overwrite untracked with normal rename/delete' '
+test_expect_success '10a: Overwrite untracked with normal rename/delete' '
+ test_setup_10a &&
(
cd 10a &&
# z/c_1 -> z/d_1 rename recorded at stage 3 for y/d +
# ERROR_MSG(refusing to lose untracked file at 'y/d')
-test_expect_success '10b-setup: Overwrite untracked with dir rename + delete' '
+test_setup_10b () {
test_create_repo 10b &&
(
cd 10b &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '10b-check: Overwrite untracked with dir rename + delete' '
+test_expect_success '10b: Overwrite untracked with dir rename + delete' '
+ test_setup_10b &&
(
cd 10b &&
# y/c~B^0 +
# ERROR_MSG(Refusing to lose untracked file at y/c)
-test_expect_success '10c-setup: Overwrite untracked with dir rename/rename(1to2)' '
- test_create_repo 10c &&
+test_setup_10c () {
+ test_create_repo 10c_$1 &&
(
- cd 10c &&
+ cd 10c_$1 &&
mkdir z x &&
echo a >z/a &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '10c-check: Overwrite untracked with dir rename/rename(1to2)' '
+test_expect_success '10c1: Overwrite untracked with dir rename/rename(1to2)' '
+ test_setup_10c 1 &&
(
- cd 10c &&
+ cd 10c_1 &&
git checkout A^0 &&
echo important >y/c &&
)
'
-test_expect_success '10c-check: Overwrite untracked with dir rename/rename(1to2), other direction' '
+test_expect_success '10c2: Overwrite untracked with dir rename/rename(1to2), other direction' '
+ test_setup_10c 2 &&
(
- cd 10c &&
+ cd 10c_2 &&
git reset --hard &&
git clean -fdqx &&
# CONFLICT(rename/rename) z/c_1 vs x/f_2 -> y/wham
# ERROR_MSG(Refusing to lose untracked file at y/wham)
-test_expect_success '10d-setup: Delete untracked with dir rename/rename(2to1)' '
+test_setup_10d () {
test_create_repo 10d &&
(
cd 10d &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '10d-check: Delete untracked with dir rename/rename(2to1)' '
+test_expect_success '10d: Delete untracked with dir rename/rename(2to1)' '
+ test_setup_10d &&
(
cd 10d &&
# Commit B: z/{a,b,c}
# Expected: y/{a,b,c} + untracked z/c
-test_expect_success '10e-setup: Does git complain about untracked file that is not really in the way?' '
+test_setup_10e () {
test_create_repo 10e &&
(
cd 10e &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_failure '10e-check: Does git complain about untracked file that is not really in the way?' '
+test_expect_failure '10e: Does git complain about untracked file that is not really in the way?' '
(
cd 10e &&
# z/c~HEAD with contents of B:z/b_v2,
# z/c with uncommitted mods on top of A:z/c_v1
-test_expect_success '11a-setup: Avoid losing dirty contents with simple rename' '
+test_setup_11a () {
test_create_repo 11a &&
(
cd 11a &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '11a-check: Avoid losing dirty contents with simple rename' '
+test_expect_success '11a: Avoid losing dirty contents with simple rename' '
+ test_setup_11a &&
(
cd 11a &&
# ERROR_MSG(Refusing to lose dirty file at z/c)
-test_expect_success '11b-setup: Avoid losing dirty file involved in directory rename' '
+test_setup_11b () {
test_create_repo 11b &&
(
cd 11b &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '11b-check: Avoid losing dirty file involved in directory rename' '
+test_expect_success '11b: Avoid losing dirty file involved in directory rename' '
+ test_setup_11b &&
(
cd 11b &&
# Expected: Abort_msg("following files would be overwritten by merge") +
# y/c left untouched (still has uncommitted mods)
-test_expect_success '11c-setup: Avoid losing not-uptodate with rename + D/F conflict' '
+test_setup_11c () {
test_create_repo 11c &&
(
cd 11c &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '11c-check: Avoid losing not-uptodate with rename + D/F conflict' '
+test_expect_success '11c: Avoid losing not-uptodate with rename + D/F conflict' '
+ test_setup_11c &&
(
cd 11c &&
# Warning_Msg("Refusing to lose dirty file at z/c) +
# y/{a,c~HEAD,c/d}, x/b, now-untracked z/c_v1 with uncommitted mods
-test_expect_success '11d-setup: Avoid losing not-uptodate with rename + D/F conflict' '
+test_setup_11d () {
test_create_repo 11d &&
(
cd 11d &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '11d-check: Avoid losing not-uptodate with rename + D/F conflict' '
+test_expect_success '11d: Avoid losing not-uptodate with rename + D/F conflict' '
+ test_setup_11d &&
(
cd 11d &&
# y/c~HEAD has A:y/c_2 contents
# y/c has dirty file from before merge
-test_expect_success '11e-setup: Avoid deleting not-uptodate with dir rename/rename(1to2)/add' '
+test_setup_11e () {
test_create_repo 11e &&
(
cd 11e &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '11e-check: Avoid deleting not-uptodate with dir rename/rename(1to2)/add' '
+test_expect_success '11e: Avoid deleting not-uptodate with dir rename/rename(1to2)/add' '
+ test_setup_11e &&
(
cd 11e &&
# CONFLICT(rename/rename) x/c vs x/d -> y/wham
# ERROR_MSG(Refusing to lose dirty file at y/wham)
-test_expect_success '11f-setup: Avoid deleting not-uptodate with dir rename/rename(2to1)' '
+test_setup_11f () {
test_create_repo 11f &&
(
cd 11f &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '11f-check: Avoid deleting not-uptodate with dir rename/rename(2to1)' '
+test_expect_success '11f: Avoid deleting not-uptodate with dir rename/rename(2to1)' '
+ test_setup_11f &&
(
cd 11f &&
# Commit B: node1/{leaf1,leaf2,leaf5}, node2/{leaf3,leaf4,leaf6}
# Expected: node1/{leaf1,leaf2,leaf5,node2/{leaf3,leaf4,leaf6}}
-test_expect_success '12a-setup: Moving one directory hierarchy into another' '
+test_setup_12a () {
test_create_repo 12a &&
(
cd 12a &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '12a-check: Moving one directory hierarchy into another' '
+test_expect_success '12a: Moving one directory hierarchy into another' '
+ test_setup_12a &&
(
cd 12a &&
# To which, I can do no more than shrug my shoulders and say that
# even simple rules give weird results when given weird inputs.
-test_expect_success '12b-setup: Moving two directory hierarchies into each other' '
+test_setup_12b () {
test_create_repo 12b &&
(
cd 12b &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '12b-check: Moving two directory hierarchies into each other' '
+test_expect_success '12b: Moving two directory hierarchies into each other' '
+ test_setup_12b &&
(
cd 12b &&
# NOTE: This is *exactly* like 12c, except that every path is modified on
# each side of the merge.
-test_expect_success '12c-setup: Moving one directory hierarchy into another w/ content merge' '
+test_setup_12c () {
test_create_repo 12c &&
(
cd 12c &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '12c-check: Moving one directory hierarchy into another w/ content merge' '
+test_expect_success '12c: Moving one directory hierarchy into another w/ content merge' '
+ test_setup_12c &&
(
cd 12c &&
# Commit B: a/b/subdir/foo, a/b/bar
# Expected: subdir/foo, bar
-test_expect_success '12d-setup: Rename/merge subdir into the root, variant 1' '
+test_setup_12d () {
test_create_repo 12d &&
(
cd 12d &&
git checkout B &&
test_commit a/b/bar
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '12d-check: Rename/merge subdir into the root, variant 1' '
+test_expect_success '12d: Rename/merge subdir into the root, variant 1' '
+ test_setup_12d &&
(
cd 12d &&
# Commit B: a/b/foo, a/b/bar
# Expected: foo, bar
-test_expect_success '12e-setup: Rename/merge subdir into the root, variant 2' '
+test_setup_12e () {
test_create_repo 12e &&
(
cd 12e &&
git checkout B &&
test_commit a/b/bar
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '12e-check: Rename/merge subdir into the root, variant 2' '
+test_expect_success '12e: Rename/merge subdir into the root, variant 2' '
+ test_setup_12e &&
(
cd 12e &&
# Commit B: z/{b,c,d,e/f}
# Expected: y/{b,c,d,e/f}, with notices/conflicts for both y/d and y/e/f
-test_expect_success '13a-setup: messages for newly added files' '
- test_create_repo 13a &&
+test_setup_13a () {
+ test_create_repo 13a_$1 &&
(
- cd 13a &&
+ cd 13a_$1 &&
mkdir z &&
echo b >z/b &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '13a-check(conflict): messages for newly added files' '
+test_expect_success '13a(conflict): messages for newly added files' '
+ test_setup_13a conflict &&
(
- cd 13a &&
+ cd 13a_conflict &&
git checkout A^0 &&
)
'
-test_expect_success '13a-check(info): messages for newly added files' '
+test_expect_success '13a(info): messages for newly added files' '
+ test_setup_13a info &&
(
- cd 13a &&
+ cd 13a_info &&
git reset --hard &&
git checkout A^0 &&
# Expected: y/{b,c,d_merged}, with two conflict messages for y/d,
# one about content, and one about file location
-test_expect_success '13b-setup: messages for transitive rename with conflicted content' '
- test_create_repo 13b &&
+test_setup_13b () {
+ test_create_repo 13b_$1 &&
(
- cd 13b &&
+ cd 13b_$1 &&
mkdir x &&
mkdir z &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '13b-check(conflict): messages for transitive rename with conflicted content' '
+test_expect_success '13b(conflict): messages for transitive rename with conflicted content' '
+ test_setup_13b conflict &&
(
- cd 13b &&
+ cd 13b_conflict &&
git checkout A^0 &&
)
'
-test_expect_success '13b-check(info): messages for transitive rename with conflicted content' '
+test_expect_success '13b(info): messages for transitive rename with conflicted content' '
+ test_setup_13b info &&
(
- cd 13b &&
+ cd 13b_info &&
git reset --hard &&
git checkout A^0 &&
# d and B had full knowledge, but that's a slippery slope as
# shown in testcase 13d.
-test_expect_success '13c-setup: messages for rename/rename(1to1) via transitive rename' '
- test_create_repo 13c &&
+test_setup_13c () {
+ test_create_repo 13c_$1 &&
(
- cd 13c &&
+ cd 13c_$1 &&
mkdir x &&
mkdir z &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '13c-check(conflict): messages for rename/rename(1to1) via transitive rename' '
+test_expect_success '13c(conflict): messages for rename/rename(1to1) via transitive rename' '
+ test_setup_13c conflict &&
(
- cd 13c &&
+ cd 13c_conflict &&
git checkout A^0 &&
)
'
-test_expect_success '13c-check(info): messages for rename/rename(1to1) via transitive rename' '
+test_expect_success '13c(info): messages for rename/rename(1to1) via transitive rename' '
+ test_setup_13c info &&
(
- cd 13c &&
+ cd 13c_info &&
git reset --hard &&
git checkout A^0 &&
# * B renames a/y to c/y, and A renames c/->d/ => a/y -> d/y
# No conflict in where a/y ends up, so put it in d/y.
-test_expect_success '13d-setup: messages for rename/rename(1to1) via dual transitive rename' '
- test_create_repo 13d &&
+test_setup_13d () {
+ test_create_repo 13d_$1 &&
(
- cd 13d &&
+ cd 13d_$1 &&
mkdir a &&
mkdir b &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '13d-check(conflict): messages for rename/rename(1to1) via dual transitive rename' '
+test_expect_success '13d(conflict): messages for rename/rename(1to1) via dual transitive rename' '
+ test_setup_13d conflict &&
(
- cd 13d &&
+ cd 13d_conflict &&
git checkout A^0 &&
)
'
-test_expect_success '13d-check(info): messages for rename/rename(1to1) via dual transitive rename' '
+test_expect_success '13d(info): messages for rename/rename(1to1) via dual transitive rename' '
+ test_setup_13d info &&
(
- cd 13d &&
+ cd 13d_info &&
git reset --hard &&
git checkout A^0 &&
# in the outer merge for this special kind of setup, but it at
# least avoids hitting a BUG().
#
-test_expect_success '13e-setup: directory rename detection in recursive case' '
+test_setup_13e () {
test_create_repo 13e &&
(
cd 13e &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "D"
)
-'
+}
-test_expect_success '13e-check: directory rename detection in recursive case' '
+test_expect_success '13e: directory rename detection in recursive case' '
+ test_setup_13e &&
(
cd 13e &&
projects / thirdparty / git.git / blobdiff