It is meaningless when creating the container, and for
subarrays, the container is responsible for assigning
spares.
Also, don't do the 'spare' fiddle for raid5 as we cannot
set up a spare at this point yet. Later maybe just create
the array degraded and let the container sort it out.
+ if (st && st->ss->external && sparedisks) {
+ fprintf(stderr,
+ Name ": This metadata type does not support "
+ "spare disks are create time\n");
+ return 1;
+ }
if (subdevs > raiddisks+sparedisks) {
fprintf(stderr, Name ": You have listed more devices (%d) than are in the array(%d)!\n", subdevs, raiddisks+sparedisks);
return 1;
if (subdevs > raiddisks+sparedisks) {
fprintf(stderr, Name ": You have listed more devices (%d) than are in the array(%d)!\n", subdevs, raiddisks+sparedisks);
return 1;
* into a spare, else the create will fail
*/
if (assume_clean == 0 && force == 0 && first_missing < raiddisks &&
* into a spare, else the create will fail
*/
if (assume_clean == 0 && force == 0 && first_missing < raiddisks &&
+ st->ss->external == 0 &&
second_missing >= raiddisks && level == 6) {
insert_point = raiddisks - 1;
if (insert_point == first_missing)
second_missing >= raiddisks && level == 6) {
insert_point = raiddisks - 1;
if (insert_point == first_missing)