There is no reason to consider this wrong. In fact one could argue that +=
is more appropriate, because we always add to options, and not replace previous
assignments. If we output a debug message, we implicitly ask people to "fix" this,
and we shouldn't.
Also, all our rules use += right now.
return log_token_invalid_attr(rules, key);
if (is_match || op == OP_REMOVE)
return log_token_invalid_op(rules, key);
- if (op == OP_ADD) {
- log_token_debug(rules, "Operator '+=' is specified to %s key, assuming '='.", key);
+ if (op == OP_ADD)
op = OP_ASSIGN;
- }
if (streq(value, "string_escape=none"))
r = rule_line_add_token(rule_line, TK_A_OPTIONS_STRING_ESCAPE_NONE, op, NULL, NULL);