1 From 246c5ffe75a2d494e415d8a7522df9fe22056d41 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
2 From: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com>
3 Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2019 13:22:14 +0200
4 Subject: [PATCH] setup.py: do not report missing dependencies for disabled
7 Reporting those missing dependencies is misleading as the modules would not
8 have been built anyway. This particularly matters in oe-core's automated
9 build completeness checker which relies on the report.
11 Upstream-Status: Inappropriate [oe-core specific]
12 Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com>
13 Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>
14 Signed-off-by: Alejandro Hernandez Samaniego <alejandro@enedino.org>
16 Signed-off-by: Tim Orling <tim.orling@konsulko.com>
20 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
22 diff --git a/setup.py b/setup.py
23 index 85a2b26357..7605347bf5 100644
26 @@ -517,6 +517,14 @@ def print_three_column(lst):
27 print("%-*s %-*s %-*s" % (longest, e, longest, f,
30 + # There is no need to report missing module dependencies,
31 + # if the modules have been disabled in the first place.
32 + # cannot use mods_disabled here, because remove_configured_extensions adds
33 + # only disabled extensions into it (doesn't cover _dbm, _gdbm, readline
34 + # we support disabling through PACKAGECONFIG)
35 + sysconf_dis = sysconfig.get_config_var('MODDISABLED_NAMES').split()
36 + self.missing = list(set(self.missing) - set(sysconf_dis))
40 print("The necessary bits to build these optional modules were not "