The PR shows us ICEing due to an unrecognizable TFmode save emitted by
aarch64_process_components. The problem is that for T{I,F,D}mode we
conservatively require mems to be in range for x-register ldp/stp. That
is because (at least for TImode) it can be allocated to both GPRs and
FPRs, and in the GPR case that is an x-reg ldp/stp, and the FPR case is
a q-register load/store.
As Richard pointed out in the PR, aarch64_get_separate_components
already checks that the offsets are suitable for a single load, so we
just need to choose a mode in aarch64_reg_save_mode that gives the full
q-register range. In this patch, we choose V16QImode as an alternative
16-byte "bag-of-bits" mode that doesn't have the artificial range
restrictions imposed on T{I,F,D}mode.
For T{F,D}mode in GCC 15 I think we could consider relaxing the
restriction imposed in aarch64_classify_address, as typically T{F,D}mode
should be allocated to FPRs. But such a change seems too invasive to
consider for GCC 14 at this stage (let alone backports).
Fortunately the new flexible load/store pair patterns in GCC 14 allow
this mode change to work without further changes. The backports are
more involved as we need to adjust the load/store pair handling to cater
for V16QImode in a few places.
Note that for the testcase we are relying on the torture options to add
-funroll-loops at -O3 which is necessary to trigger the ICE on trunk
(but not on the 13 branch).
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR target/111677
* config/aarch64/aarch64.cc (aarch64_reg_save_mode): Use
V16QImode for the full 16-byte FPR saves in the vector PCS case.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR target/111677
* gcc.target/aarch64/torture/pr111677.c: New test.