]> git.ipfire.org Git - thirdparty/gcc.git/commit
projects / thirdparty / gcc.git / commit
? search:
summary | shortlog | log | commit | commitdiff | tree
(parent: 55fcaa9) | patch
doc: Clarification for -Wmissing-field-initializers
authorMarek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
Thu, 8 Jun 2023 17:52:11 +0000 (13:52 -0400)
committerMarek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
Fri, 9 Jun 2023 14:22:42 +0000 (10:22 -0400)
commit0f8f1dee851c23bce19977b2531cf69b4da9f88f
tree63c1bb8f6ae32770eb60ad9b9c6e669274741e0ftree
parent55fcaa9a8bd9c8ce97ca929fc902c88cf92786a0commit | diff
doc: Clarification for -Wmissing-field-initializers

The manual is incorrect in saying that the option does not warn
about designated initializers, which it does in C++.  Whether the
divergence in behavior is desirable is another thing, but let's
at least make the manual match the reality.

PR c/39589
PR c++/96868

gcc/ChangeLog:

* doc/invoke.texi: Clarify that -Wmissing-field-initializers doesn't
warn about designated initializers in C only.
gcc/doc/invoke.texi diff | blob | blame | history
Mirror of https://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git