perf trace: Fix potential u64 underflow in duration calculation

perf trace: Fix potential u64 underflow in duration calculation

Although it happens very rarely, in case of out-of-order events (i.e.
due to CPU migration when a syscall is executed), the calculation of
event duration might underflow and thus a bogus value is printed:

    2.804 ( 0.001 ms): :49553/49553 rt_sigaction(sig: QUIT, act: 0x7fff403ed6e0, oact: 0x7fff403ed780, sigsetsize: 8) = 0
    2.807 ( 0.001 ms): :49553/49553 rt_sigaction(sig: CHLD, act: 0x7fff403ed6e0, oact: 0x7fff403ed780, sigsetsize: 8) = 0
    2.815 (18446744073709.438 ms): :49553/49553 execve(filename: 0xbb173a30, argv: 0x55aabb171930, envp: 0x55aabb171120) = 0
    2.815 ( 0.534 ms): pwd/49553  ... [continued]: execve())                                           = 0

Check for possible underflow first and in case of a bogus value, do
not print it.

    2.804 ( 0.001 ms): :49553/49553 rt_sigaction(sig: QUIT, act: 0x7fff403ed6e0, oact: 0x7fff403ed780, sigsetsize: 8) = 0
    2.807 ( 0.001 ms): :49553/49553 rt_sigaction(sig: CHLD, act: 0x7fff403ed6e0, oact: 0x7fff403ed780, sigsetsize: 8) = 0
    2.815 (         ): :49553/49553 execve(filename: 0xbb173a30, argv: 0x55aabb171930, envp: 0x55aabb171120) = 0
    2.815 ( 0.534 ms): pwd/49553  ... [continued]: execve())                                           = 0

Signed-off-by: Michael Petlan <mpetlan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>