mm/vma: clean up __vma_enter/exit_locked()

mm/vma: clean up __vma_enter/exit_locked()

These functions are very confusing indeed.  'Entering' a lock could be
interpreted as acquiring it, but this is not what these functions are
interacting with.

Equally they don't indicate at all what kind of lock we are 'entering' or
'exiting'.  Finally they are misleading as we invoke these functions when
we already hold a write lock to detach a VMA.

These functions are explicitly simply 'entering' and 'exiting' a state in
which we hold the EXCLUSIVE lock in order that we can either mark the VMA
as being write-locked, or mark the VMA detached.

Rename the functions accordingly, and also update
__vma_end_exclude_readers() to return detached state with a __must_check
directive, as it is simply clumsy to pass an output pointer here to
detached state and inconsistent vs.  __vma_start_exclude_readers().

Finally, remove the unnecessary 'inline' directives.

No functional change intended.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/33273be9389712347d69987c408ca7436f0c1b22.1769198904.git.lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@oracle.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>