]> git.ipfire.org Git - thirdparty/openembedded/openembedded-core-contrib.git/commit
cml1: remove diffconfig return code checking
authorBruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>
Thu, 28 Sep 2017 15:59:09 +0000 (11:59 -0400)
committerRichard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Sat, 7 Oct 2017 22:20:39 +0000 (23:20 +0100)
commit748356ff34899ce74d3d682e13d05b8bc2bc05e3
treeaefd59e026b5672db3e62a3850666fdc59d5dd28
parent43fc3d8e180c168dbe5dd5faa577e69a279bd1bd
cml1: remove diffconfig return code checking

The following commit:

[
  commit 578c8205fd14c48c6d30ef2889d86f1b4aee060a
  Author: Mikko Rapeli <mikko.rapeli@bmw.de>
  Date:   Thu Jun 22 16:23:14 2017 +0300

      meta: Fix return value checks from subprocess.call()'s

      Python function subprocess.call() returns the return value of the
      executed process. If return values are not checked, errors may
      go unnoticed and bad things can happen.

      Change all callers of subprocess.call() which do not check for
      the return value to use subprocess.check_call() which raises
      CalledProcessError if the subprocess returns with non-zero value.

      https://docs.python.org/2/library/subprocess.html#using-the-subprocess-module

      All users of the function were found with:

      $ git grep "subprocess\.call" | \
            egrep -v 'if.*subprocess\.call|=\
            +subprocess\.call|return.*subprocess\.call'

      Tested similar patch on top of yocto jethro. Only compile tested
      core-image-minimal on poky master branch.

Signed-off-by: Mikko Rapeli <mikko.rapeli@bmw.de>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
]

Added return code checking to do_diffconfig. Although the change is
well intentioned, it isn't correct in this instance since 'diff' returns
'1' to indicate that there are differences in the files .. and not as
an error code.

subprocess.check_call() flags this as an error and the routine aborts.

We are already checking the inputs, and in fact already know there's a
diff in the files before we even make the call, so there's no need to
look for an error in this case.

Putting back subprocess.call() restores the routine to working order.

[YOCTO #12132]

(From OE-Core rev: ec48b8fd79181978f90b4b0ab00fbe78ddbd416e)

Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
meta/classes/cml1.bbclass