jit: Fix accidentally-harmless type confusion

jit: Fix accidentally-harmless type confusion

In 2a0faed9d702, which added JIT compilation support for expressions, I
accidentally used sizeof(LLVMBasicBlockRef *) instead of
sizeof(LLVMBasicBlockRef) as part of computing the size of an allocation. That
turns out to have no real negative consequences due to LLVMBasicBlockRef being
a pointer itself (and thus having the same size). It still is wrong and
confusing, so fix it.

Reported by coverity.

Backpatch-through: 13