That's fine for now, but it will not handle future bs > ps, as
bio_iter_iovec() returns a single-page bvec, meaning the bv_len will not
exceed page size.
This means the code using that bv can only handle a block if bs <= ps.
To address this problem and handle future bs > ps cases better:
- Introduce a helper btrfs_bio_for_each_block()
Instead of bio_vec, which has single and multiple page version and
multiple page version has quite some limits, use my favorite way to
represent a block, phys_addr_t.
For bs <= ps cases, nothing is changed, except we will do a very
small overhead to convert phys_addr_t to a folio, then use the proper
folio helpers to handle the possible highmem cases.
For bs > ps cases, all blocks will be backed by large folios, meaning
every folio will cover at least one block. And still use proper folio
helpers to handle highmem cases.
With phys_addr_t, we will handle both large folio and highmem
properly. So there is no better single variable to present a btrfs
block than phys_addr_t.
- Extract the data block csum calculation into a helper
The new helper, btrfs_calculate_block_csum() will be utilized by
btrfs_csum_one_bio().
- Use btrfs_bio_for_each_block() to replace existing call sites
Including:
* index_one_bio() from raid56.c
Very straight-forward.
* btrfs_check_read_bio()
Also update repair_one_sector() to grab the folio using phys_addr_t,
and do extra checks to make sure the folio covers at least one
block.
We do not need to bother bv_len at all now.
* btrfs_csum_one_bio()
Now we can move the highmem handling into a dedicated helper,
calculate_block_csum(), and use btrfs_bio_for_each_block() helper.
There is one exception in btrfs_decompress_buf2page(), which is copying
decompressed data into the original bio, which is not iterating using
block size thus we don't need to bother.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>