cpu: Add lockdep_is_cpus_held()/lockdep_is_cpus_write_held() stubs for !CONFIG_HOTPLU...

cpu: Add lockdep_is_cpus_held()/lockdep_is_cpus_write_held() stubs for !CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU

lockdep_is_cpus_held() and lockdep_is_cpus_write_held() are undefined when
!CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU. This is ok because their few callers protect the calls
with a "if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU) ..." check.

It is error prone to require callers to protect lockdep_is_cpus_held()
and lockdep_is_cpus_write_held() with an IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU)
check while the custom for equivalent functions, for example the more
prevalent lockdep_is_held(), is to not require similar protection.
It is also inconsistent with CPU hotplug lockdep code self since related
call lockdep_assert_cpus_held() does not require protection.

Create stubs for lockdep_is_cpus_held() and lockdep_is_cpus_write_held()
that returns 1 (LOCK_STATE_UNKNOWN/LOCK_STATE_HELD) when !CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU.
This makes the CPU hotplug lockdep checks consistent while following
existing lockdep custom. Drop the "extern" from the function declaration
as part of the move to match kernel coding style.

Keep the IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU) checks in existing users since
removing them would change the logic of these expressions.

Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/7484f0b58fd86153d445819cc4e172adba16cff9.1780543665.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com
Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1780456704.git.reinette.chatre%40intel.com?part=1