c++: comptypes ICE with BOUND_TEMPLATE_TEMPLATE_PARMs [PR107539]
Here we end up giving the two BOUND_TEMPLATE_TEMPLATE_PARMs
C<decltype(f::t)> and C<decltype(g::t)> the same TYPE_CANONICAL because
the hash table that interns TYPE_CANONICAL for template type parameters
doesn't set the comparing_specializations flag which controls how
PARM_DECLs from different contexts compare equal.
Later, from spec_hasher::equal for the corresponding two specializations
A<C<decltype(f::t)>> and A<C<decltype(g::t)>>, we compare the two bound
ttps with comparing_specializations set hence they now (structurally)
compare different despite having the same TYPE_CANONICAL, and so we get
the error:
internal compiler error: same canonical type node for different types
'C<decltype (t)>' and 'C<decltype (t)>'
This suggests that we should be setting comparing_specializations from
ctp_hasher::equal to match spec_hasher::equal. But doing so introduces
a separate ICE in cpp2a/concepts-placeholder3.C:
internal compiler error: canonical types differ for identical types
'auto [requires ::same_as<<placeholder>, decltype(f::x)>]' and
'auto [requires ::same_as<<placeholder>, decltype(g::x)>]'
because norm_hasher::equal doesn't set comparing_specializations either.
I'm not sure when exactly we need to set comparing_specializations given
what it controls (TYPENAME_TYPE equality/hashing and PARM_DECL equality)
but it seems to be the conservative choice to set the flag wherever we
have a global hash table that relies on type equality. To that end this
patch sets comparing_specializations in ctp_hasher and norm_hasher, as
well as in atom_hasher and sat_hasher for good measure. This turns out
to be a compile time win of about 2% in some concepts tests, probably
because of the improved TYPENAME_TYPE hashing enabled by the flag.