selftests/bpf: Provide weak definitions for cross-test functions

selftests/bpf: Provide weak definitions for cross-test functions

Some test files reference functions defined in other translation units that
may not be compiled when skeletons are missing. Replace forward
declarations of uprobe_multi_func_{1,2,3}() with weak no-op stubs so the
linker resolves them regardless of which objects are present.

The stub bodies are `asm volatile ("")` rather than empty, matching the
shape of the strong definitions in prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c. This
keeps the weak and strong sides on the same footing for the optimiser
(noinline + asm-barrier), which is the form upstream already relies on
for these functions.

Move stack_mprotect() from test_lsm.c into testing_helpers.c so it is
always available. The previous weak-stub approach returned 0, which would
cause callers expecting -1/EPERM to fail their assertions
deterministically. Having the real implementation in a shared utility
avoids this problem entirely.

Include <alloca.h> for alloca() so the build does not rely on glibc's
implicit declaration via <stdlib.h>.

Signed-off-by: Ricardo B. Marlière <rbm@suse.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260602-selftests-bpf_misconfig-v12-10-27f898b3ba26@suse.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>