]> git.ipfire.org Git - thirdparty/kernel/stable.git/commit
KVM: s390: Clarify SIGP orders versus STOP/RESTART
authorEric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
Mon, 13 Dec 2021 21:05:50 +0000 (22:05 +0100)
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Thu, 27 Jan 2022 08:04:13 +0000 (09:04 +0100)
commitd7136feccf4b056eda960cbc935a8f478c3b9bc7
treeb03511565d898869f32e87206180c636141f8138
parente8fcfcdc9e1e99135cff6db3509d26042135e645
KVM: s390: Clarify SIGP orders versus STOP/RESTART

commit 812de04661c4daa7ac385c0dfd62594540538034 upstream.

With KVM_CAP_S390_USER_SIGP, there are only five Signal Processor
orders (CONDITIONAL EMERGENCY SIGNAL, EMERGENCY SIGNAL, EXTERNAL CALL,
SENSE, and SENSE RUNNING STATUS) which are intended for frequent use
and thus are processed in-kernel. The remainder are sent to userspace
with the KVM_CAP_S390_USER_SIGP capability. Of those, three orders
(RESTART, STOP, and STOP AND STORE STATUS) have the potential to
inject work back into the kernel, and thus are asynchronous.

Let's look for those pending IRQs when processing one of the in-kernel
SIGP orders, and return BUSY (CC2) if one is in process. This is in
agreement with the Principles of Operation, which states that only one
order can be "active" on a CPU at a time.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211213210550.856213-2-farman@linux.ibm.com
[borntraeger@linux.ibm.com: add stable tag]
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
arch/s390/kvm/sigp.c