The comment this patch changes claimed that operational aspects are
"view-specific". The following excerpt from ARM 13.1 (11/5) indicates
that the set of view-specific aspects is in fact much more restricted:
If a type-related aspect is defined for the partial view of a type,
then it has the same definition for the full view of the type, except
for certain Boolean-valued operational aspects where the language
specifies that the partial view can have the value False even when
the full view has the value True.
On the other hand, a feature of operational aspects is that they can be
specified on partial views, unlike representation aspects. That's stated
by AARM 13.1 (9.c/1):
Unlike representation items, operational items can be specified on
partial views.
So this patch changes the comment to be about that instead.