KVM: SVM: Virtualize and advertise support for ERAPS

KVM: SVM: Virtualize and advertise support for ERAPS

AMD CPUs with the Enhanced Return Address Predictor Security (ERAPS)
feature (available on Zen5+) obviate the need for FILL_RETURN_BUFFER
sequences right after VMEXITs.  ERAPS adds guest/host tags to entries in
the RSB (a.k.a. RAP).  This helps with speculation protection across the
VM boundary, and it also preserves host and guest entries in the RSB that
can improve software performance (which would otherwise be flushed due to
the FILL_RETURN_BUFFER sequences).

Importantly, ERAPS also improves cross-domain security by clearing the RAP
in certain situations.  Specifically, the RAP is cleared in response to
actions that are typically tied to software context switching between
tasks.  Per the APM:

  The ERAPS feature eliminates the need to execute CALL instructions to
  clear the return address predictor in most cases. On processors that
  support ERAPS, return addresses from CALL instructions executed in host
  mode are not used in guest mode, and vice versa. Additionally, the
  return address predictor is cleared in all cases when the TLB is
  implicitly invalidated and in the following cases:

  • MOV CR3 instruction
  • INVPCID other than single address invalidation (operation type 0)

ERAPS also allows CPUs to extends the size of the RSB/RAP from the older
standard (of 32 entries) to a new size, enumerated in CPUID leaf
0x80000021:EBX bits 23:16 (64 entries in Zen5 CPUs).

In hardware, ERAPS is always-on, when running in host context, the CPU
uses the full RSB/RAP size without any software changes necessary.
However, when running in guest context, the CPU utilizes the full size of
the RSB/RAP if and only if the new ALLOW_LARGER_RAP flag is set in the
VMCB; if the flag is not set, the CPU limits itself to the historical size
of 32 entires.

Requiring software to opt-in for guest usage of RAPs larger than 32 entries
allows hypervisors, i.e. KVM, to emulate the aforementioned conditions in
which the RAP is cleared as well as the guest/host split.  E.g. if the CPU
unconditionally used the full RAP for guests, failure to clear the RAP on
transitions between L1 or L2, or on emulated guest TLB flushes, would
expose the guest to RAP-based attacks as a guest without support for ERAPS
wouldn't know that its FILL_RETURN_BUFFER sequence is insufficient.

Address the ~two broad categories of ERAPS emulation, and advertise
ERAPS support to userspace, along with the RAP size enumerated in CPUID.

1. Architectural RAP clearing: as above, CPUs with ERAPS clear RAP entries
   on several conditions, including CR3 updates.  To handle scenarios
   where a relevant operation is handled in common code (emulation of
   INVPCID and to a lesser extent MOV CR3), piggyback VCPU_EXREG_CR3 and
   create an alias, VCPU_EXREG_ERAPS.  SVM doesn't utilize CR3 dirty
   tracking, and so for all intents and purposes VCPU_EXREG_CR3 is unused.
   Aliasing VCPU_EXREG_ERAPS ensures that any flow that writes CR3 will
   also clear the guest's RAP, and allows common x86 to mark ERAPS vCPUs
   as needing a RAP clear without having to add a new request (or other
   mechanism).

2. Nested guests: the ERAPS feature adds host/guest tagging to entries
   in the RSB, but does not distinguish between the guest ASIDs.  To
   prevent the case of an L2 guest poisoning the RSB to attack the L1
   guest, the CPU exposes a new VMCB bit (CLEAR_RAP).  The next
   VMRUN with a VMCB that has this bit set causes the CPU to flush the
   RSB before entering the guest context.  Set the bit in VMCB01 after a
   nested #VMEXIT to ensure the next time the L1 guest runs, its RSB
   contents aren't polluted by the L2's contents.  Similarly, before
   entry into a nested guest, set the bit for VMCB02, so that the L1
   guest's RSB contents are not leaked/used in the L2 context.

Enable ALLOW_LARGER_RAP (and emulate RAP clears) if and only if ERAPS is
exposed to the guest.  Enabling ALLOW_LARGER_RAP unconditionally wouldn't
cause any functional issues, but ignoring userspace's (and L1's) desires
would put KVM into a grey area, which is especially undesirable due to the
potential security implications.  E.g. if a use case wants to have L1 do
manual RAP clearing even when ERAPS is present in hardware, enabling
ALLOW_LARGER_RAP could result in L1 leaving stale entries in the RAP.

ERAPS is documented in AMD APM Vol 2 (Pub 24593), in revisions 3.43 and
later.

Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@amd.com>
Co-developed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@amd.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/aR913X8EqO6meCqa@google.com