fetch: make set_head() call easier to read
We ignore any error returned from set_head(), but
638060dcb9 (fetch
set_head: refactor to use remote directly, 2025-01-26) left its call in
a noop "if" conditional as a sort of note-to-self.
When
c834d1a7ce (fetch: only respect followRemoteHEAD with configured
refspecs, 2025-03-18) added a "do_set_head" flag, it was rolled into the
same conditional, putting set_head() on the right-hand side of a
short-circuit AND.
That's not wrong, but it really hides the point of the line, which
is (maybe) calling the function.
Instead, let's have a full if() block for the flag, and then our comment
(with some rewording) will be sufficient to clarify the error handling.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>