[gdb/symtab] Fix missing breakpoint location for inlined function
Consider the test-case contained in this patch.
With -readnow, we have two breakpoint locations:
...
$ gdb -readnow -batch breakpoint-locs -ex "b N1::C1::baz" -ex "info break"
Breakpoint 1 at 0x4004cb: N1::C1::baz. (2 locations)
Num Type Disp Enb Address What
1 breakpoint keep y <MULTIPLE>
1.1 y 0x00000000004004cb in N1::C1::baz() \
at breakpoint-locs.h:6
1.2 y 0x00000000004004f0 in N1::C1::baz() \
at breakpoint-locs.h:6
...
But without -readnow, we have instead only one breakpoint location:
...
$ gdb -batch breakpoint-locs -ex "b N1::C1::baz" -ex "info break"
Breakpoint 1 at 0x4004f0: file breakpoint-locs.h, line 6.
Num Type Disp Enb Address What
1 breakpoint keep y 0x00000000004004f0 in N1::C1::baz() \
at breakpoint-locs.h:6
...
The missing breakpoint location is specified by DIE 0x161, which is ignored by
the partial DIE reader because it's a child of a DW_TAG_subprogram DIE (at
0x146, for foo).
Fix this by not ignoring the DIE during partial DIE reading.
Tested on x86_64-linux.
gdb/ChangeLog:
2020-06-03 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
PR symtab/26046
* dwarf2/read.c (scan_partial_symbols): Recurse into DW_TAG_subprogram
children for C++.
(load_partial_dies): Don't skip DW_TAG_inlined_subroutine child of
DW_TAG_subprogram.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2020-06-03 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
PR symtab/26046
* gdb.cp/breakpoint-locs-2.cc: New test.
* gdb.cp/breakpoint-locs.cc: New test.
* gdb.cp/breakpoint-locs.exp: New file.
* gdb.cp/breakpoint-locs.h: New test.