+ dnl In the test code below:
+ dnl * We test for the presence of _nl_msg_cat_cntr because GNU libc and
+ dnl libintl define this variable, whereas Solaris 10 libc/libintl
+ dnl (which we don't want to use, as it does not support GNU .mo files)
+ dnl does not define it.
+ dnl * We don't test for _nl_msg_cat_cntr on MSVC, because the use of a
+ dnl variable under MSVC depends on whether it is exported by a shared
+ dnl library or a static library: If libintl is a shared library, we
+ dnl would have to declare it with __declspec(dllimport), whereas if it
+ dnl is a static library, we would have to declare it without such a
+ dnl __declspec. But libintl comes with just one header file,
+ dnl <libintl.h>, that does not declare _nl_msg_cat_cntr and that does
+ dnl not tell us whether the library was built shared or static.
+ dnl * We test for the presence of _nl_domain_bindings because GNU libc
+ dnl defines this variable, whereas NetBSD libc (which we don't want to
+ dnl use, as it was broken at least in 2002) does not define it.
+ dnl * We test for the presence of _nl_expand_alias because GNU libintl
+ dnl defines this function, whereas NetBSD libintl (which we don't want
+ dnl to use, as it was broken at least in 2002) does not define it.
+