librpc/rpc: fix regression in NT_STATUS_RPC_ENUM_VALUE_OUT_OF_RANGE error mapping

Commit 1eef70872930fa4f9d3dedd23476b34cae638428 changed the mapping for
DCERPC_NCA_S_FAULT_INVALID_TAG from NT_STATUS_RPC_ENUM_VALUE_OUT_OF_RANGE
to NT_STATUS_RPC_PROCNUM_OUT_OF_RANGE.

BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12585

Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit c97e39b34fcf260ded42ef1a9efe7ed55e65a1cf)

diff --git a/librpc/rpc/dcerpc_error.c b/librpc/rpc/dcerpc_error.c
index f38602528d687b42914303d693552527f68d4ffe..8af0e71e744f1f272746f9c43c9edbb244e3973c 100644 (file)
--- a/librpc/rpc/dcerpc_error.c
+++ b/librpc/rpc/dcerpc_error.c
@@ -50,12 +50,10 @@ static const struct dcerpc_fault_table dcerpc_faults[] =
        _FAULT_STR(DCERPC_NCA_S_FAULT_INT_DIV_BY_ZERO, NT_STATUS_RPC_FP_DIV_ZERO),
        _FAULT_STR(DCERPC_NCA_S_FAULT_INT_OVERFLOW, NT_STATUS_RPC_FP_OVERFLOW),
        /*
-        * What's the difference between NT_STATUS_RPC_INVALID_TAG
-        * and NT_STATUS_RPC_PROCNUM_OUT_OF_RANGE ???
-        *
-        * Our callers expect NT_STATUS_RPC_PROCNUM_OUT_OF_RANGE.
+        * Our callers expect NT_STATUS_RPC_ENUM_VALUE_OUT_OF_RANGE
+        * instead of NT_STATUS_RPC_INVALID_TAG.
         */
-       _FAULT_STR(DCERPC_NCA_S_FAULT_INVALID_TAG, NT_STATUS_RPC_PROCNUM_OUT_OF_RANGE),
+       _FAULT_STR(DCERPC_NCA_S_FAULT_INVALID_TAG, NT_STATUS_RPC_ENUM_VALUE_OUT_OF_RANGE),
        _FAULT_STR(DCERPC_NCA_S_FAULT_INVALID_TAG, NT_STATUS_RPC_INVALID_TAG),
        _FAULT_STR(DCERPC_NCA_S_FAULT_INVALID_BOUND, NT_STATUS_RPC_INVALID_BOUND),
        _FAULT_STR(DCERPC_NCA_S_FAULT_RPC_VERSION_MISMATCH, NT_STATUS_RPC_PROTOCOL_ERROR),