The C/C++ clause splitting happens very early during construct parsing,
but only the FEs later on handle possible instantiations, non-static
member handling and array section lowering.
In the OpenMP 5.0/5.1 rules, whether firstprivate is added to combined
target depends on whether it isn't also mentioned in lastprivate or map
clauses, but unfortunately I think such checks are much better done only
when the FEs perform all the above mentioned changes.
So, this patch arranges for the firstprivate clause to be copied or moved
to combined target construct (as before), but sets flags on that clause,
which tell the FE *finish_omp_clauses and the gimplifier it has been added
only conditionally and let the FEs and gimplifier DTRT for these.
2021-05-21 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR middle-end/99928
gcc/
* tree.h (OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT_TARGET): Define.
* gimplify.c (enum gimplify_omp_var_data): Fix up
GOVD_MAP_HAS_ATTACHMENTS value, add GOVD_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT.
(omp_lastprivate_for_combined_outer_constructs): If combined target
has GOVD_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT set for the decl, change it to
GOVD_MAP | GOVD_SEEN.
(gimplify_scan_omp_clauses): Set GOVD_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT for
firstprivate clauses with OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT.
(gimplify_adjust_omp_clauses): For firstprivate clauses with
OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT either clear that bit and
OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT_TARGET too, or remove it and
let it be replaced by implicit map clause.
gcc/c-family/
* c-omp.c (c_omp_split_clauses): Set OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT
on firstprivate clause copy going to target construct, and for
target simd set also OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT_TARGET bit.
gcc/c/
* c-typeck.c (c_finish_omp_clauses): Move firstprivate clauses with
OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT to the end of the chain. Don't error
if a decl is mentioned both in map clause and in such firstprivate
clause unless OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT_TARGET is also set.
gcc/cp/
* semantics.c (finish_omp_clauses): Move firstprivate clauses with
OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT to the end of the chain. Don't error
if a decl is mentioned both in map clause and in such firstprivate
clause unless OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT_TARGET is also set.
gcc/testsuite/
* c-c++-common/gomp/pr99928-3.c: Remove all xfails.
* c-c++-common/gomp/pr99928-15.c: New test.
(cherry picked from commit
b5c1c7a96bc8d7062d2c35675f48131667498182)
+2021-05-23 Tobias Burnus <tobias@codesourcery.com>
+
+ Backported from master:
+ 2021-05-21 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
+
+ PR middle-end/99928
+ * tree.h (OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT_TARGET): Define.
+ * gimplify.c (enum gimplify_omp_var_data): Fix up
+ GOVD_MAP_HAS_ATTACHMENTS value, add GOVD_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT.
+ (omp_lastprivate_for_combined_outer_constructs): If combined target
+ has GOVD_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT set for the decl, change it to
+ GOVD_MAP | GOVD_SEEN.
+ (gimplify_scan_omp_clauses): Set GOVD_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT for
+ firstprivate clauses with OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT.
+ (gimplify_adjust_omp_clauses): For firstprivate clauses with
+ OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT either clear that bit and
+ OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT_TARGET too, or remove it and
+ let it be replaced by implicit map clause.
+
2021-05-23 Tobias Burnus <tobias@codesourcery.com>
Backported from master:
+2021-05-23 Tobias Burnus <tobias@codesourcery.com>
+
+ Backported from master:
+ 2021-05-21 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
+
+ PR middle-end/99928
+ * c-omp.c (c_omp_split_clauses): Set OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT
+ on firstprivate clause copy going to target construct, and for
+ target simd set also OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT_TARGET bit.
+
+2021-05-23 Tobias Burnus <tobias@codesourcery.com>
+
+ Backported from master:
+ 2021-05-21 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
2021-04-30 Kwok Cheung Yeung <kcy@codesourcery.com>
Backport from mainline
(check_and_annotate_for_loop): Use the new helper function.
2020-08-30 Sandra Loosemore <sandra@codesourcery.com>
-
+
* c-omp.c (annotate_for_loop): Move initializer processing...
(check_and_annotate_for_loop): ... to here. Allow the loop
variable as either operand to the condition.
{
/* This must be #pragma omp target simd. */
s = C_OMP_CLAUSE_SPLIT_TARGET;
+ OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT (clauses) = 1;
+ OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT_TARGET (clauses) = 1;
break;
}
c = build_omp_clause (OMP_CLAUSE_LOCATION (clauses),
OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE);
+ /* firstprivate should not be applied to target if it is
+ also lastprivate or on the combined/composite construct,
+ or if it is mentioned in map clause. OMP_CLAUSE_DECLs
+ may need to go through FE handling though (instantiation,
+ C++ non-static data members, array section lowering), so
+ add the clause with OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT and
+ let *finish_omp_clauses and the gimplifier handle it
+ right. */
+ OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT (c) = 1;
OMP_CLAUSE_DECL (c) = OMP_CLAUSE_DECL (clauses);
OMP_CLAUSE_CHAIN (c) = cclauses[C_OMP_CLAUSE_SPLIT_TARGET];
cclauses[C_OMP_CLAUSE_SPLIT_TARGET] = c;
+2021-05-23 Tobias Burnus <tobias@codesourcery.com>
+
+ Backported from master:
+ 2021-05-21 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
+
+ PR middle-end/99928
+ * c-typeck.c (c_finish_omp_clauses): Move firstprivate clauses with
+ OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT to the end of the chain. Don't error
+ if a decl is mentioned both in map clause and in such firstprivate
+ clause unless OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT_TARGET is also set.
+
2021-05-19 Tobias Burnus <tobias@codesourcery.com>
Backported from master:
has been seen, -2 if mixed inscan/normal reduction diagnosed. */
int reduction_seen = 0;
bool allocate_seen = false;
+ bool firstprivate_implicit_moved = false;
bool oacc_gang_seen = false;
bitmap_obstack_initialize (NULL);
break;
case OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE:
+ if (OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT (c)
+ && !firstprivate_implicit_moved)
+ {
+ firstprivate_implicit_moved = true;
+ /* Move firstprivate clauses with
+ OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT set to the end of
+ clauses chain. */
+ tree cl = NULL, *pc1 = pc, *pc2 = &cl;
+ while (*pc1)
+ if (OMP_CLAUSE_CODE (*pc1) == OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE
+ && OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT (*pc1))
+ {
+ *pc2 = *pc1;
+ pc2 = &OMP_CLAUSE_CHAIN (*pc2);
+ *pc1 = OMP_CLAUSE_CHAIN (*pc1);
+ }
+ else
+ pc1 = &OMP_CLAUSE_CHAIN (*pc1);
+ *pc2 = NULL;
+ *pc1 = cl;
+ if (pc1 != pc)
+ continue;
+ }
t = OMP_CLAUSE_DECL (c);
need_complete = true;
need_implicitly_determined = true;
if (ort == C_ORT_ACC)
error_at (OMP_CLAUSE_LOCATION (c),
"%qD appears more than once in data clauses", t);
+ else if (OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT (c)
+ && !OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT_TARGET (c))
+ /* Silently drop the clause. */;
else
error_at (OMP_CLAUSE_LOCATION (c),
"%qD appears both in data and map clauses", t);
+2021-05-23 Tobias Burnus <tobias@codesourcery.com>
+
+ Backported from master:
+ 2021-05-21 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
+
+ PR middle-end/99928
+ * semantics.c (finish_omp_clauses): Move firstprivate clauses with
+ OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT to the end of the chain. Don't error
+ if a decl is mentioned both in map clause and in such firstprivate
+ clause unless OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT_TARGET is also set.
+
2021-05-19 Tobias Burnus <tobias@codesourcery.com>
Backported from master:
bool allocate_seen = false;
tree detach_seen = NULL_TREE;
bool mergeable_seen = false;
+ bool firstprivate_implicit_moved = false;
bool oacc_gang_seen = false;
bitmap_obstack_initialize (NULL);
break;
case OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE:
+ if (OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT (c)
+ && !firstprivate_implicit_moved)
+ {
+ firstprivate_implicit_moved = true;
+ /* Move firstprivate clauses with
+ OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT set to the end of
+ clauses chain. */
+ tree cl = NULL, *pc1 = pc, *pc2 = &cl;
+ while (*pc1)
+ if (OMP_CLAUSE_CODE (*pc1) == OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE
+ && OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT (*pc1))
+ {
+ *pc2 = *pc1;
+ pc2 = &OMP_CLAUSE_CHAIN (*pc2);
+ *pc1 = OMP_CLAUSE_CHAIN (*pc1);
+ }
+ else
+ pc1 = &OMP_CLAUSE_CHAIN (*pc1);
+ *pc2 = NULL;
+ *pc1 = cl;
+ if (pc1 != pc)
+ continue;
+ }
t = omp_clause_decl_field (OMP_CLAUSE_DECL (c));
if (t)
omp_note_field_privatization (t, OMP_CLAUSE_DECL (c));
if (ort == C_ORT_ACC)
error_at (OMP_CLAUSE_LOCATION (c),
"%qD appears more than once in data clauses", t);
+ else if (OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT (c)
+ && !OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT_TARGET (c))
+ /* Silently drop the clause. */;
else
error_at (OMP_CLAUSE_LOCATION (c),
"%qD appears both in data and map clauses", t);
/* Flag for GOVD_MAP: (struct) vars that have pointer attachments for
fields. */
- GOVD_MAP_HAS_ATTACHMENTS = 8388608,
+ GOVD_MAP_HAS_ATTACHMENTS = 0x4000000,
+
+ /* Flag for GOVD_FIRSTPRIVATE: OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT. */
+ GOVD_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT = 0x8000000,
/* Flag for OpenACC deviceptrs. */
GOVD_DEVICEPTR = (1<<24),
omp_add_variable (octx, decl, GOVD_LASTPRIVATE | GOVD_SEEN);
continue;
}
- if (octx->region_type == ORT_COMBINED_TARGET
- && splay_tree_lookup (octx->variables,
- (splay_tree_key) decl) == NULL)
+ if (octx->region_type == ORT_COMBINED_TARGET)
{
- omp_add_variable (octx, decl, GOVD_MAP | GOVD_SEEN);
- octx = octx->outer_context;
- break;
+ splay_tree_node n = splay_tree_lookup (octx->variables,
+ (splay_tree_key) decl);
+ if (n == NULL)
+ {
+ omp_add_variable (octx, decl, GOVD_MAP | GOVD_SEEN);
+ octx = octx->outer_context;
+ }
+ else if (!implicit_p
+ && (n->value & GOVD_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT))
+ {
+ n->value &= ~(GOVD_FIRSTPRIVATE
+ | GOVD_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT
+ | GOVD_EXPLICIT);
+ omp_add_variable (octx, decl, GOVD_MAP | GOVD_SEEN);
+ octx = octx->outer_context;
+ }
}
break;
}
case OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE:
flags = GOVD_FIRSTPRIVATE | GOVD_EXPLICIT;
check_non_private = "firstprivate";
+ if (OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT (c))
+ {
+ gcc_assert (code == OMP_TARGET);
+ flags |= GOVD_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT;
+ }
goto do_add;
case OMP_CLAUSE_LASTPRIVATE:
if (OMP_CLAUSE_LASTPRIVATE_CONDITIONAL (c))
remove = true;
break;
}
+ if (OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT (c))
+ {
+ decl = OMP_CLAUSE_DECL (c);
+ n = splay_tree_lookup (ctx->variables, (splay_tree_key) decl);
+ if ((n->value & GOVD_MAP) != 0)
+ {
+ remove = true;
+ break;
+ }
+ OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT_TARGET (c) = 0;
+ OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT (c) = 0;
+ }
/* FALLTHRU */
case OMP_CLAUSE_PRIVATE:
case OMP_CLAUSE_SHARED:
+2021-05-23 Tobias Burnus <tobias@codesourcery.com>
+
+ Backported from master:
+ 2021-05-21 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
+
+ PR middle-end/99928
+ * c-c++-common/gomp/pr99928-3.c: Remove all xfails.
+ * c-c++-common/gomp/pr99928-15.c: New test.
+
2021-05-23 Tobias Burnus <tobias@codesourcery.com>
Backported from master:
--- /dev/null
+/* PR middle-end/99928 */
+
+int v;
+
+void
+foo (void)
+{
+ #pragma omp target parallel firstprivate (v) map(tofrom: v) /* { dg-bogus "'v' appears both in data and map clauses" } */
+ v++;
+}
+
+void
+bar (void)
+{
+ #pragma omp target firstprivate (v) map (tofrom: v) /* { dg-error "'v' appears both in data and map clauses" } */
+ v++;
+}
+
+void
+baz (void)
+{
+ int j;
+ #pragma omp target simd firstprivate (v) map (tofrom: v) private (j) /* { dg-error "'v' appears both in data and map clauses" } */
+ for (int i = 0; i < 1; i++)
+ j = v;
+}
#pragma omp section
l07 = 2;
}
- /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "omp target\[^\n\r]*map\\(tofrom:l08" "gimple" { xfail *-*-* } } } */
- /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "omp target\[^\n\r]*firstprivate\\(l08\\)" "gimple" { xfail *-*-* } } } */
+ /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "omp target\[^\n\r]*map\\(tofrom:l08" "gimple" } } */
+ /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "omp target\[^\n\r]*firstprivate\\(l08\\)" "gimple" } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "omp parallel\[^\n\r]*firstprivate\\(l08\\)" "gimple" } } *//* FIXME: This should be on for instead. */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "omp parallel\[^\n\r]*lastprivate\\(l08\\)" "gimple" } } *//* FIXME: This should be on for instead. */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "omp for\[^\n\r]*firstprivate\\(l08\\)" "gimple" } } *//* FIXME. */
#pragma omp target parallel for firstprivate (l08) lastprivate (l08)
for (int i = 0; i < 64; i++)
l08 = i;
- /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "omp target\[^\n\r]*map\\(tofrom:l09" "gimple" { xfail *-*-* } } } */
- /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "omp target\[^\n\r]*firstprivate\\(l09\\)" "gimple" { xfail *-*-* } } } */
+ /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "omp target\[^\n\r]*map\\(tofrom:l09" "gimple" } } */
+ /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "omp target\[^\n\r]*firstprivate\\(l09\\)" "gimple" } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "omp parallel\[^\n\r]*firstprivate\\(l09\\)" "gimple" } } *//* FIXME: This should be on for instead. */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "omp parallel\[^\n\r]*lastprivate\\(l09\\)" "gimple" } } *//* FIXME: This should be on for instead. */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "omp for\[^\n\r]*firstprivate\\(l09\\)" "gimple" } } *//* FIXME. */
#pragma omp target parallel for simd firstprivate (l09) lastprivate (l09)
for (int i = 0; i < 64; i++)
l09 = i;
- /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "omp target\[^\n\r]*map\\(tofrom:l10" "gimple" { xfail *-*-* } } } */
- /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "omp target\[^\n\r]*firstprivate\\(l10\\)" "gimple" { xfail *-*-* } } } */
+ /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "omp target\[^\n\r]*map\\(tofrom:l10" "gimple" } } */
+ /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "omp target\[^\n\r]*firstprivate\\(l10\\)" "gimple" } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "omp simd\[^\n\r]*firstprivate\\(l10\\)" "gimple" } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "omp simd\[^\n\r]*lastprivate\\(l10\\)" "gimple" } } */
#pragma omp target simd firstprivate (l10) lastprivate (l10)
#define OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_NO_REFERENCE(NODE) \
TREE_PRIVATE (OMP_CLAUSE_SUBCODE_CHECK (NODE, OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE))
+/* True on a FIRSTPRIVATE clause with OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT also
+ set if target construct is the only one that accepts the clause. */
+#define OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT_TARGET(NODE) \
+ TREE_PROTECTED (OMP_CLAUSE_SUBCODE_CHECK (NODE, OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE))
+
/* True on a LASTPRIVATE clause if a FIRSTPRIVATE clause for the same
decl is present in the chain. */
#define OMP_CLAUSE_LASTPRIVATE_FIRSTPRIVATE(NODE) \