K Prateek noticed we weren't setting the rq->next_class in
proxy_resched_idle(), when I was debugging an issue seen with
CONFIG_SCHED_PROXY_EXEC and some of Peter's new patches, and
suggested this fix.
So set rq->next_class when we temporarily switch the donor to
idle, so we don't accidentally call wakeup_preempt_fair()
with idle as the donor.
Suggested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260514234732.3170197-1-jstultz@google.com
static inline struct task_struct *proxy_resched_idle(struct rq *rq)
{
put_prev_set_next_task(rq, rq->donor, rq->idle);
+ rq->next_class = &idle_sched_class;
rq_set_donor(rq, rq->idle);
set_tsk_need_resched(rq->idle);
return rq->idle;