Some time ago I noticed that we don't properly delay parsing of
noexcept for member function templates. This patch fixes that.
It didn't work because even though we set CP_PARSER_FLAGS_DELAY_NOEXCEPT
in cp_parser_member_declaration, member template declarations take
a different path: we call cp_parser_template_declaration and return
prior to setting the flag.
PR c++/99980
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* parser.c (cp_parser_single_declaration): Maybe pass
CP_PARSER_FLAGS_DELAY_NOEXCEPT down to cp_parser_init_declarator.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept71.C: New test.
&& (cp_lexer_next_token_is_not (parser->lexer, CPP_SEMICOLON)
|| decl_specifiers.type != error_mark_node))
{
+ int flags = CP_PARSER_FLAGS_TYPENAME_OPTIONAL;
+ /* We don't delay parsing for friends, though CWG 2510 may change
+ that. */
+ if (member_p && !(friend_p && *friend_p))
+ flags |= CP_PARSER_FLAGS_DELAY_NOEXCEPT;
decl = cp_parser_init_declarator (parser,
- CP_PARSER_FLAGS_TYPENAME_OPTIONAL,
+ flags,
&decl_specifiers,
checks,
/*function_definition_allowed_p=*/true,
--- /dev/null
+// PR c++/99980
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+#define SA(X) static_assert(X, #X)
+
+struct S {
+ template<typename T>
+ void f(T) noexcept(B);
+
+ struct N {
+ template<typename T>
+ void f2(T) noexcept(B);
+ };
+
+ static constexpr bool B = true;
+};
+
+S s;
+SA(noexcept(s.f(10)));
+S::N n;
+SA(noexcept(n.f2(10)));
+
+struct Bad {
+ template<typename T>
+ using U = void() noexcept(B); // { dg-error "not declared" }
+
+ template<typename T>
+ friend void friendo() noexcept(B); // { dg-error "not declared" }
+
+ static constexpr bool B = true;
+};