sched/core: Fix TASK_DEAD race in finish_task_switch()

commit 95913d97914f44db2b81271c2e2ebd4d2ac2df83 upstream.

So the problem this patch is trying to address is as follows:

        CPU0                            CPU1

        context_switch(A, B)
                                        ttwu(A)
                                          LOCK A->pi_lock
                                          A->on_cpu == 0
        finish_task_switch(A)
          prev_state = A->state  <-.
          WMB                      |
          A->on_cpu = 0;           |
          UNLOCK rq0->lock         |
                                   |    context_switch(C, A)
                                   `--  A->state = TASK_DEAD
          prev_state == TASK_DEAD
            put_task_struct(A)
                                        context_switch(A, C)
                                        finish_task_switch(A)
                                          A->state == TASK_DEAD
                                            put_task_struct(A)

The argument being that the WMB will allow the load of A->state on CPU0
to cross over and observe CPU1's store of A->state, which will then
result in a double-drop and use-after-free.

Now the comment states (and this was true once upon a long time ago)
that we need to observe A->state while holding rq->lock because that
will order us against the wakeup; however the wakeup will not in fact
acquire (that) rq->lock; it takes A->pi_lock these days.

We can obviously fix this by upgrading the WMB to an MB, but that is
expensive, so we'd rather avoid that.

The alternative this patch takes is: smp_store_release(&A->on_cpu, 0),
which avoids the MB on some archs, but not important ones like ARM.

Reported-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: manfred@colorfullife.com
Cc: will.deacon@arm.com
Fixes: e4a52bcb9a18 ("sched: Remove rq->lock from the first half of ttwu()")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150929124509.GG3816@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index e2f9d020e4f68c124b4b8731679604e506f92867..20771a55029d3a1157cb18887c123d0a44abf46d 100644 (file)
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2461,11 +2461,11 @@ static struct rq *finish_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev)
         * If a task dies, then it sets TASK_DEAD in tsk->state and calls
         * schedule one last time. The schedule call will never return, and
         * the scheduled task must drop that reference.
-        * The test for TASK_DEAD must occur while the runqueue locks are
-        * still held, otherwise prev could be scheduled on another cpu, die
-        * there before we look at prev->state, and then the reference would
-        * be dropped twice.
-        *              Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
+        *
+        * We must observe prev->state before clearing prev->on_cpu (in
+        * finish_lock_switch), otherwise a concurrent wakeup can get prev
+        * running on another CPU and we could rave with its RUNNING -> DEAD
+        * transition, resulting in a double drop.
         */
        prev_state = prev->state;
        vtime_task_switch(prev);

diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 84d48790bb6d0607e5dd67dd449f0353c51b0136..08ab96b366bfa1253e44119b716424299038ee42 100644 (file)
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1091,9 +1091,10 @@ static inline void finish_lock_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
         * After ->on_cpu is cleared, the task can be moved to a different CPU.
         * We must ensure this doesn't happen until the switch is completely
         * finished.
+        *
+        * Pairs with the control dependency and rmb in try_to_wake_up().
         */
-       smp_wmb();
-       prev->on_cpu = 0;
+       smp_store_release(&prev->on_cpu, 0);
 #endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK
        /* this is a valid case when another task releases the spinlock */