I was a bit surprised when my newly-added define_peephole2 didn't
match, but it was because it was expected to partially match the
generated output of a previous define_peephole2, which matched and
modified the last insn of a sequence to be matched. I had assumed
that the algorithm backed-up the size of the match-buffer, thereby
exposing newly created opportunities *with sufficient context* to all
define_peephole2's. While things can change in that direction, let's
start with documenting the current state.
* doc/md.texi (define_peephole2): Document order of scanning.
@code{FAIL}), then the @code{define_peephole2} uses the replacement
template.
+Insns are scanned in forward order from beginning to end for each basic
+block. Matches are attempted in order of @code{define_peephole2}
+appearance in the @file{md} file. After a successful replacement,
+scanning for further opportunities for @code{define_peephole2}, resumes
+with the first generated replacement insn as the first insn to be
+matched against all @code{define_peephole2}. For the example above,
+after its successful replacement, the first insn that can be matched by
+a @code{define_peephole2} is @code{(set (match_dup 4) (match_dup 1))}.
+
@end ifset
@ifset INTERNALS
@node Insn Attributes