===
==============================================================================
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+--- Functionality changes from Asterisk 13.31.0 to Asterisk 13.32.0 ----------
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Messaging
+------------------
+ * In order to reduce the amount of AMI and ARI events generated,
+ the global "Message/ast_msg_queue" channel can be set to suppress
+ it's normal channel housekeeping events such as "Newexten",
+ "VarSet", etc. This can greatly reduce load on the manager
+ and ARI applications when the Digium Phone Module for Asterisk
+ is in use. To enable, set "hide_messaging_ami_events" in
+ asterisk.conf to "yes" In Asterisk versions <18, the default
+ is "no" preserving existing behavior. Beginning with
+ Asterisk 18, the option will default to "yes".
+
+app_mixmonitor
+------------------
+ * If the 'filename' argument to MixMonitor() ended with '.wav49,'
+ Asterisk would silently convert the extension to '.WAV' when opening
+ the file for writing. This caused the MIXMONITOR_FILENAME variable to
+ reference the wrong file. The MIXMONITOR_FILENAME variable will now
+ reflect the name of the file that Asterisk actually used instead of
+ the filename that was passed to the application.
+
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--- Functionality changes from Asterisk 13.30.0 to Asterisk 13.31.0 ----------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
===
===========================================================
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+--- Functionality changes from Asterisk 13.31.0 to Asterisk 13.32.0 ----------
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+ARI
+------------------
+ * The "TextMessageReceived" event used to include a list of "TextMessageVariable"
+ objects as part of its output. Due to a couple of bugs in Asterisk a list of
+ received variables was never included even if ones were available. However,
+ variables set to send would be (which they should have not been), but would
+ fail validation due to the bad formatting.
+
+ So basically there was no way to get a "TextMessageReceived" event with
+ variables. Due to this the API has changed. The "TextMessageVariable" object
+ no longer exists. "TextMessageReceived" now returns a JSON object of key/value
+ pairs. So for instance instead of a list of "TextMessageVariable" objects:
+
+ [ TextMessageVariable, TextMessageVariable, TextMessageVariable]
+
+ where a TextMessageVariable was supposed to be:
+
+ { "key": "<var name>", "value":, "<var value>" }
+
+ The output is now just:
+
+ { "<var name>": "<var value>" }
+
+ This aligns more with how variables are specified when sending a message, as
+ well as other variable lists in ARI.
+
+res_stasis
+------------------
+ * The "TextMessageReceived" event used to include a list of "TextMessageVariable"
+ objects as part of its output. Due to a couple of bugs in Asterisk a list of
+ received variables was never included even if ones were available. However,
+ variables set to send would be (which they should have not been), but would
+ fail validation due to the bad formatting.
+
+ So basically there was no way to get a "TextMessageReceived" event with
+ variables. Due to this the API has changed. The "TextMessageVariable" object
+ no longer exists. "TextMessageReceived" now returns a JSON object of key/value
+ pairs. So for instance instead of a list of "TextMessageVariable" objects:
+
+ [ TextMessageVariable, TextMessageVariable, TextMessageVariable]
+
+ where a TextMessageVariable was supposed to be:
+
+ { "key": "<var name>", "value":, "<var value>" }
+
+ The output is now just:
+
+ { "<var name>": "<var value>" }
+
+ This aligns more with how variables are specified when sending a message, as
+ well as other variable lists in ARI.
+
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--- Functionality changes from Asterisk 13.29.0 to Asterisk 13.30.0 ----------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+++ /dev/null
-Subject: app_mixmonitor
-
-If the 'filename' argument to MixMonitor() ended with '.wav49,'
-Asterisk would silently convert the extension to '.WAV' when opening
-the file for writing. This caused the MIXMONITOR_FILENAME variable to
-reference the wrong file. The MIXMONITOR_FILENAME variable will now
-reflect the name of the file that Asterisk actually used instead of
-the filename that was passed to the application.
+++ /dev/null
-Subject: Messaging
-
-In order to reduce the amount of AMI and ARI events generated,
-the global "Message/ast_msg_queue" channel can be set to suppress
-it's normal channel housekeeping events such as "Newexten",
-"VarSet", etc. This can greatly reduce load on the manager
-and ARI applications when the Digium Phone Module for Asterisk
-is in use. To enable, set "hide_messaging_ami_events" in
-asterisk.conf to "yes" In Asterisk versions <18, the default
-is "no" preserving existing behavior. Beginning with
-Asterisk 18, the option will default to "yes".
+++ /dev/null
-Subject: ARI
-Subject: res_stasis
-
-The "TextMessageReceived" event used to include a list of "TextMessageVariable"
-objects as part of its output. Due to a couple of bugs in Asterisk a list of
-received variables was never included even if ones were available. However,
-variables set to send would be (which they should have not been), but would
-fail validation due to the bad formatting.
-
-So basically there was no way to get a "TextMessageReceived" event with
-variables. Due to this the API has changed. The "TextMessageVariable" object
-no longer exists. "TextMessageReceived" now returns a JSON object of key/value
-pairs. So for instance instead of a list of "TextMessageVariable" objects:
-
-[ TextMessageVariable, TextMessageVariable, TextMessageVariable]
-
-where a TextMessageVariable was supposed to be:
-
-{ "key": "<var name>", "value":, "<var value>" }
-
-The output is now just:
-
-{ "<var name>": "<var value>" }
-
-This aligns more with how variables are specified when sending a message, as
-well as other variable lists in ARI.