If encryption is disabled globally, per definition we shouldn't allow
enabling encryption on individual shares.
The behaviour of setting
[Global]
smb encrypt = off
[share_required]
smb encrypt = required
[share_desired]
smb encrypt = desired
must be to completely deny access to the share "share_required" and an
unencrypted connection to "share_desired".
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12520
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit
43a90cee46bb7a70f7973c4fc51eee7634e43145)
conn->short_case_preserve = lp_short_preserve_case(snum);
conn->encrypt_level = lp_smb_encrypt(snum);
+ if (conn->encrypt_level > SMB_SIGNING_OFF) {
+ if (lp_smb_encrypt(-1) == SMB_SIGNING_OFF) {
+ if (conn->encrypt_level == SMB_SIGNING_REQUIRED) {
+ DBG_ERR("Service [%s] requires encryption, but "
+ "it is disabled globally!\n",
+ lp_servicename(talloc_tos(), snum));
+ status = NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED;
+ goto err_root_exit;
+ }
+ conn->encrypt_level = SMB_SIGNING_OFF;
+ }
+ }
conn->veto_list = NULL;
conn->hide_list = NULL;