.csi_dt = MIPI_CSI2_DT_RGB565,
}, {
.fourcc = V4L2_PIX_FMT_RGB24, /* rgb */
- .code = MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_1X24,
+ .code = MEDIA_BUS_FMT_BGR888_1X24,
.depth = 24,
.csi_dt = MIPI_CSI2_DT_RGB888,
}, {
.fourcc = V4L2_PIX_FMT_BGR24, /* bgr */
- .code = MEDIA_BUS_FMT_BGR888_1X24,
+ .code = MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_1X24,
.depth = 24,
.csi_dt = MIPI_CSI2_DT_RGB888,
}, {
const struct v4l2_pix_format *fmt = &node->fmt.fmt.pix;
const struct unicam_format_info *fmtinfo;
- fmtinfo = unicam_find_format_by_fourcc(fmt->pixelformat,
- UNICAM_SD_PAD_SOURCE_IMAGE);
+ fmtinfo = unicam_find_format_by_code(format->code,
+ UNICAM_SD_PAD_SOURCE_IMAGE);
if (WARN_ON(!fmtinfo)) {
ret = -EPIPE;
goto out;
}
- if (fmtinfo->code != format->code ||
- fmt->height != format->height ||
+ /*
+ * Unicam initially associated BGR24 to BGR888_1X24 and RGB24 to
+ * RGB888_1X24.
+ *
+ * In order to allow the applications using the old behaviour to
+ * run, let's accept the old combination, but warn about it.
+ */
+ if (fmtinfo->fourcc != fmt->pixelformat) {
+ if ((fmt->pixelformat == V4L2_PIX_FMT_BGR24 &&
+ format->code == MEDIA_BUS_FMT_BGR888_1X24) ||
+ (fmt->pixelformat == V4L2_PIX_FMT_RGB24 &&
+ format->code == MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_1X24)) {
+ dev_warn_once(node->dev->dev,
+ "Incorrect pixel format %p4cc for 0x%04x. Fix your application to use %p4cc.\n",
+ &fmt->pixelformat, format->code, &fmtinfo->fourcc);
+ } else {
+ dev_dbg(node->dev->dev,
+ "image: format mismatch: 0x%04x <=> %p4cc\n",
+ format->code, &fmt->pixelformat);
+ ret = -EPIPE;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (fmt->height != format->height ||
fmt->width != format->width ||
fmt->field != format->field) {
dev_dbg(node->dev->dev,
- "image: (%u x %u) 0x%08x %s != (%u x %u) 0x%08x %s\n",
- fmt->width, fmt->height, fmtinfo->code,
+ "image: (%u x %u) %s != (%u x %u) %s\n",
+ fmt->width, fmt->height,
v4l2_field_names[fmt->field],
- format->width, format->height, format->code,
+ format->width, format->height,
v4l2_field_names[format->field]);
ret = -EPIPE;
}