The variable index used in this scenario for accessing the dahdi_pvts was
wrong and was most likely copied from the several other places it is used
correctly.
(closes issue #15998)
Reported by: tsearle
Patches:
dahdi_reset_crash.patch uploaded by tsearle (license 373)
Modified:
branches/1.4/channels/chan_dahdi.c
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.6.1@222396
65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-
fbb531ad65f3
pri_destroycall(pri->pri, pri->pvts[x]->call);
pri->pvts[x]->call = NULL;
}
- if (pri->pvts[chanpos]->realcall)
- pri_hangup_all(pri->pvts[chanpos]->realcall, pri);
+ if (pri->pvts[x]->realcall)
+ pri_hangup_all(pri->pvts[x]->realcall, pri);
else if (pri->pvts[x]->owner)
pri->pvts[x]->owner->_softhangup |= AST_SOFTHANGUP_DEV;
ast_mutex_unlock(&pri->pvts[x]->lock);