Memcheck reports an error on "if (n == 42)" in this test. Unless, that is,
accurate CmpEQ/NE definedness tracking is enabled. If you stare at this
long enough it is possible to see that the test "n == 42" isn't actually
undefined, because |n| is only ever zero or one, and only its least
significant bit is undefined. So the equality comparison against 42 is
defined because there are corresponding bits in the two operands that are
different and are both defined.
This commit fixes that by comparing with 1, which forces the result to
really depend on the only undefined bit in |n|.
I also added robustification:
* return arbitrary values from gcc_cant_inline_me(), so as to avoid gcc
simply copying the input to the output or otherwise deleting the
conditional branch.
* marking gcc_cant_inline_me() as un-inlineable
* Putting compiler barriers in the second conditional in main(), so gcc
can't simply ignore the result of the call to gcc_cant_inline_me() and
then delete the call entirely.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
-
-int gcc_cant_inline_me ( int );
-
+int foo, bar;
+#define CBAR do { __asm__ __volatile__("":::"cc","memory"); } while (0)
+int* gcc_cant_inline_me ( int );
int main ()
{
int *x, y;
y = *x == 173;
- if (gcc_cant_inline_me(y)) { }
+ if (gcc_cant_inline_me(y) == &foo) { CBAR; } else { CBAR; }
return 0;
}
/* must be AFTER main */
-int gcc_cant_inline_me ( int n )
+__attribute__((noinline)) int* gcc_cant_inline_me ( int n )
{
- if (n == 42)
- return 1; /* forty-two, dudes! */
+ if (n == 1)
+ return &foo; /* foo! */
else
- return 0; /* some other number, dudes! */
+ return &bar; /* bar! */
}