The i.MX95 CSI-2 controller is nearly identical to i.MX93, with the
main difference being the data output interface:
i.MX93 use IPI (Image Pixel Interface), which requires:
- Pixel clock input
- Software configuration through registers
i.MX95 uses IDI (Image Data Interface), which:
- Does not require pixel clock
- Is software transparent (no register configuration needed)
Due to these differences in register layout and initialization needs,
the two variants cannot share the same compatible string. The driver
needs to distinguish between them to handle the interface correctly.
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com>
Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Guoniu Zhou <guoniu.zhou@oss.nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
oneOf:
- enum:
- fsl,imx93-mipi-csi2
+ - fsl,imx95-mipi-csi2
- rockchip,rk3568-mipi-csi2
- items:
- enum:
clock-names:
minItems: 2
+ - if:
+ properties:
+ compatible:
+ contains:
+ const: fsl,imx95-mipi-csi2
+ then:
+ properties:
+ interrupts:
+ maxItems: 1
+ interrupt-names: false
+ clocks:
+ maxItems: 1
+ clock-names:
+ maxItems: 1
+
examples:
- |
#include <dt-bindings/clock/rk3568-cru.h>