cpufreq drivers are supposed to use either ->setpolicy() or
->target()/->target_index().
Simplify the existing check by collapsing it into a single boolean
expression:
(!!driver->setpolicy == (driver->target_index || driver->target))
This is a readability/maintainability cleanup and keeps the semantics
unchanged.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Zihuan Zhang <zhangzihuan@kylinos.cn>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250822070424.166795-3-zhangzihuan@kylinos.cn
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
return -EPROBE_DEFER;
if (!driver_data || !driver_data->verify || !driver_data->init ||
- !(driver_data->setpolicy || driver_data->target_index ||
- driver_data->target) ||
- (driver_data->setpolicy && (driver_data->target_index ||
- driver_data->target)) ||
+ (!!driver_data->setpolicy == (driver_data->target_index || driver_data->target)) ||
(!driver_data->get_intermediate != !driver_data->target_intermediate) ||
(!driver_data->online != !driver_data->offline) ||
(driver_data->adjust_perf && !driver_data->fast_switch))