This means that the workers will be able to resume each other's TLS sessions, regardless of whether the user has configured it to do so.
- answer NOTIMPL for meta-types and non-IN RR classes (!1589)
+- views: improve interaction with old-style policies (!1576)
Bugfixes
--------
end
-- Perform a list of actions sequentially; meant for kr_view_insert_action().
+-- Return value of the last one is propagated.
function policy.COMBINE(list)
if #list == 1 then return list[1] end
local r = 'function(state,req) '
- for _, item in ipairs(list) do
+ for i, item in ipairs(list) do
+ if i == #list then
+ r = r .. 'return '
+ end
r = r .. item .. '(state,req); '
end
return r .. 'end'
if ffi.C.kr_view_select_action(req, view_action_buf) == 0 then
local act_str = ffi.string(view_action_buf[0].data, view_action_buf[0].len)
- return loadstring('return '..act_str)()(state, req)
+ local new_state = loadstring('return '..act_str)()(state, req)
+ -- We still respect the chain-rule notion, i.e. we skip
+ -- lua-configured policy rules iff the action was "final"
+ -- (`refused` and `noanswer` in the current 6.x)
+ if new_state ~= nil then return new_state end
end
local qry = req:initial() -- same as :current() but more descriptive