There's no fundamental reason why -flive-patching=inline-clone can't
coexist with -flto. Yes, one can theoretically have many more clone
function that includes a live patch. It is pretty much the same
as in-module inlining.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* opts.cc (finish_options): Print sorry message only
for -flive-patching=inline-only-static.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.dg/live-patching-2.c: Update scanned pattern.
* gcc.dg/live-patching-5.c: New test.
"%<-fsanitize=kernel-address%>");
/* Currently live patching is not support for LTO. */
- if (opts->x_flag_live_patching && opts->x_flag_lto)
- sorry ("live patching is not supported with LTO");
+ if (opts->x_flag_live_patching == LIVE_PATCHING_INLINE_ONLY_STATIC && opts->x_flag_lto)
+ sorry ("live patching (with %qs) is not supported with LTO",
+ "inline-only-static");
/* Currently vtable verification is not supported for LTO */
if (opts->x_flag_vtable_verify && opts->x_flag_lto)
/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-require-effective-target lto } */
-/* { dg-options "-O2 -flive-patching -flto" } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -flive-patching=inline-only-static -flto" } */
int main()
{
return 0;
}
-/* { dg-message "sorry, unimplemented: live patching is not supported with LTO" "-flive-patching and -flto together" { target *-*-* } 0 } */
+/* { dg-message "sorry, unimplemented: live patching \\(with 'inline-only-static'\\) is not supported with LTO" "-flive-patching and -flto together" { target *-*-* } 0 } */
--- /dev/null
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target lto } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -flive-patching -flto" } */
+
+int main()
+{
+ return 0;
+}