--- /dev/null
+#!/bin/sh
+# Try to remove '/' recursively.
+
+# Copyright (C) 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+
+# This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
+# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+# the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
+# (at your option) any later version.
+
+# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+# GNU General Public License for more details.
+
+# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
+
+. "${srcdir=.}/tests/init.sh"; path_prepend_ ./src
+print_ver_ rm
+
+# POSIX mandates rm(1) to skip '/' arguments. This test verifies this mandated
+# behavior as well as the --preserve-root and --no-preserve-root options.
+# Especially the latter case is a live fire exercise as rm(1) is supposed to
+# enter the unlinkat() system call. Therefore, limit the risk as much
+# as possible -- if there's a bug this test would wipe the system out!
+
+# Faint-hearted: skip this test for the 'root' user.
+skip_if_root_
+
+# Pull the teeth from rm(1) by intercepting the unlinkat() system call via the
+# LD_PRELOAD environment variable. This requires shared libraries to work.
+require_gcc_shared_
+
+# This isn't terribly expensive, but it must not be run under heavy load.
+# The reason is the conservative 'timeout' setting below to limit possible
+# damage in the worst case which yields a race under heavy load.
+# Marking this test as "expensive" therefore is a compromise, i.e., adding
+# this test to the list ensures it still gets _some_ (albeit minimal)
+# coverage while not causing false-positive failures in day to day runs.
+expensive_
+
+cat > k.c <<'EOF' || framework_failure_
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
+
+int unlinkat (int dirfd, const char *pathname, int flags)
+{
+ /* Prove that LD_PRELOAD works: create the evidence file "x". */
+ fclose (fopen ("x", "w"));
+
+ /* Immediately terminate, unless indicated otherwise. */
+ if (! getenv("CU_TEST_SKIP_EXIT"))
+ _exit (0);
+
+ /* Pretend success. */
+ return 0;
+}
+EOF
+
+# Then compile/link it:
+gcc -Wall --std=gnu99 -shared -fPIC -ldl -O2 k.c -o k.so \
+ || framework_failure_ 'failed to build shared library'
+
+#-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# exercise_rm_r_root: shell function to test "rm -r '/'"
+# The caller must provide the FILE to remove as well as any options
+# which should be passed to 'rm'.
+# Paranoia mode on:
+# For the worst case where both rm(1) would fail to refuse to process the "/"
+# argument (in the cases without the --no-preserve-root option), and
+# intercepting the unlinkat(1) system call would fail (which actually already
+# has been proven to work above), and the current non root user has
+# write access to "/", limit the damage to the current file system via
+# the --one-file-system option.
+# Furthermore, run rm(1) via timeout(1) that kills that process after
+# a maximum of 2 seconds.
+exercise_rm_r_root ()
+{
+ # Remove the evidence file "x"; verify that.
+ rm -f x || framework_failure_
+ test -f x && framework_failure_
+
+ local skip_exit=
+ if [ "$CU_TEST_SKIP_EXIT" = 1 ]; then
+ # Pass on this variable into 'rm's environment.
+ skip_exit='CU_TEST_SKIP_EXIT=1'
+ fi
+
+ timeout --signal=KILL 2 \
+ env LD_PRELOAD=./k.so $skip_exit \
+ rm -rv --one-file-system "$@" > out 2> err
+
+ return $?
+}
+
+# Verify that "rm -r dir" basically works.
+mkdir dir || framework_failure_
+rm -r dir || framework_failure_
+test -d dir && framework_failure_
+
+# Now verify that intercepting unlinkat() works:
+# rm(1) must succeed as before, but this time both the evidence file "x"
+# and the test file / directory must still exist afterward.
+mkdir dir || framework_failure_
+: > file || framework_failure_
+
+skip=
+for file in dir file ; do
+ exercise_rm_r_root "$file" || skip=1
+ test -e "$file" || skip=1
+ test -f x || skip=1
+
+ test $skip = 1 \
+ && { cat out; cat err; \
+ skip_ "internal test failure: maybe LD_PRELOAD doesn't work?"; }
+done
+
+# "rm -r /" without --no-preserve-root should output the following
+# diagnostic error message.
+cat <<EOD > exp || framework_failure_
+rm: it is dangerous to operate recursively on '/'
+rm: use --no-preserve-root to override this failsafe
+EOD
+
+#-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Exercise "rm -r /" without and with the --preserve-root option.
+# Exercise various synonyms of "/" including symlinks to it.
+# Expect a non-Zero exit status.
+# Prepare a few symlinks to "/".
+ln -s / rootlink || framework_failure_
+ln -s rootlink rootlink2 || framework_failure_
+ln -sr / rootlink3 || framework_failure_
+
+for opts in \
+ '/' \
+ '--preserve-root /' \
+ '//' \
+ '///' \
+ '////' \
+ 'rootlink/' \
+ 'rootlink2/' \
+ 'rootlink3/' ; do
+
+ exercise_rm_r_root $opts \
+ && fail=1
+
+ # For some of the synonyms, the error diagnostic slightly differs from that
+ # of the basic "/" case (see gnulib's fts_open' and ROOT_DEV_INO_WARN):
+ # rm: it is dangerous to operate recursively on 'FILE' (same as '/')
+ # Strip that part off for the following comparison.
+ sed "s/\(rm: it is dangerous to operate recursively on\).*$/\1 '\/'/" err \
+ > err2 || framework_failure_
+
+ # Expect nothing in 'out' and the above error diagnostic in 'err2'.
+ # As rm(1) should have skipped the "/" argument, it does not call unlinkat().
+ # Therefore, the evidence file "x" should not exist.
+ compare /dev/null out || fail=1
+ compare exp err2 || fail=1
+ test -f x && fail=1
+
+ # Do nothing more if this test failed.
+ test $fail = 1 && { cat out; cat err; Exit $fail; }
+done
+
+#-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Exercise "rm -r file1 / file2".
+# Expect a non-Zero exit status representing failure to remove "/",
+# yet 'file1' and 'file2' should be removed.
+: > file1 || framework_failure_
+: > file2 || framework_failure_
+
+# Now that we know that 'rm' won't call the unlinkat() system function for "/",
+# we could probably execute it without the LD_PRELOAD'ed safety net.
+# Nevertheless, it's still better to use it for this test.
+# Tell the unlinkat() replacement function to not _exit(0) immediately
+# by setting the following variable.
+CU_TEST_SKIP_EXIT=1
+
+exercise_rm_r_root --preserve-root file1 '/' file2 \
+ && fail=1
+
+unset CU_TEST_SKIP_EXIT
+
+cat <<EOD > out_removed
+removed 'file1'
+removed 'file2'
+EOD
+
+# The above error diagnostic should appear in 'err'.
+# Both 'file1' and 'file2' should be removed. Simply verify that in the
+# "out" file, as the replacement unlinkat() dummy did not remove them.
+# Expect the evidence file "x" to exist.
+compare out_removed out || fail=1
+compare exp err || fail=1
+test -f x || fail=1
+
+# Do nothing more if this test failed.
+test $fail = 1 && { cat out; cat err; Exit $fail; }
+
+#-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Exercise various synonyms of "/" having a trailing "." or ".." in the name.
+# This triggers another check in the code first and therefore leads to a
+# different diagnostic. However, we want to test anyway to protect against
+# future reordering of the checks in the code.
+# Expect that other error diagnostic in 'err' and nothing in 'out'.
+# Expect a non-Zero exit status. The evidence file "x" should not exist.
+for file in \
+ '//.' \
+ '/./' \
+ '/.//' \
+ '/../' \
+ '/.././' \
+ '/etc/..' \
+ 'rootlink/..' \
+ 'rootlink2/.' \
+ 'rootlink3/./' ; do
+
+ test -d "$file" || continue # if e.g. /etc does not exist.
+
+ exercise_rm_r_root --preserve-root "$file" \
+ && fail=1
+
+ grep "^rm: refusing to remove '\.' or '\.\.' directory: skipping" err \
+ || fail=1
+
+ compare /dev/null out || fail=1
+ test -f x && fail=1
+
+ # Do nothing more if this test failed.
+ test $fail = 1 && { cat out; cat err; Exit $fail; }
+done
+
+#-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Until now, it was all just fun.
+# Now exercise the --no-preserve-root option with which rm(1) should enter
+# the intercepted unlinkat() system call.
+# As the interception code terminates the process immediately via _exit(0),
+# the exit status should be 0.
+# Use the option --interactive=never to bypass the following prompt:
+# "rm: descend into write-protected directory '/'?"
+exercise_rm_r_root --interactive=never --no-preserve-root '/' \
+ || fail=1
+
+# The 'err' file should not contain the above error diagnostic.
+grep "^rm: it is dangerous to operate recursively on '/'" err \
+ && fail=1
+
+# Instead, rm(1) should have called the intercepted unlinkat() function,
+# i.e. the evidence file "x" should exist.
+test -f x || fail=1
+
+test $fail = 1 && { cat out; cat err; }
+
+Exit $fail
projects / thirdparty / coreutils.git / commitdiff
