2010-12-13 Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini@gmail.com>
+ Libobj tests: refer to automake bug tracker for limitations.
+ * tests/libobj15b.test (configure.in): In the comment explaining
+ why an apparently redundant AC_OUTPUT is indeed needed, refer
+ to the relevant entry in the Automake bug tracker rather than
+ describing the bug in detail with a FIXME-style comment.
+ * tests/libobj15c.test: Likewise.
+ * tests/libobj20b.test: Likewise.
+
Libobj tests: do not use `##' automake comments in-line.
* tests/libobj19.test (Makefile.am): Do not use inline `##'
comments in the definition of AUTOMAKE_OPTIONS.
AC_PROG_CC
AC_PROG_RANLIB
AC_LIBSOURCE([foobar.c])
-# FIXME: without a call to AC_OUTPUT, Automake does not fail when file(s)
-# specified in AC_LIBSOURCE call(s) do not exist. Should we fix
-# this limitation? Or is the current behaviour good enough?
+# NOTE: this call to AC_OUTPUT is really needed; see Automake bug #7635
+# <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=7635>
AC_OUTPUT
END
AC_PROG_CC
AC_PROG_RANLIB
AC_LIBSOURCES([foobar.c, bazquux.c])
-# FIXME: without a call to AC_OUTPUT, Automake does not fail when file(s)
-# specified in AC_LIBSOURCES call(s) do not exist. Should we fix
-# this limitation? Or is the current behaviour good enough?
+# NOTE: this call to AC_OUTPUT is really needed; see Automake bug #7635
+# <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=7635>
AC_OUTPUT
END
AC_PROG_CC
AC_PROG_RANLIB
AC_LIBSOURCE([foobar.c])
-# FIXME: without a call to AC_OUTPUT, Automake does not fail when file(s)
-# specified in AC_LIBSOURCE call(s) do not exist. Should we fix
-# this limitation? Or is the current behaviour good enough?
+# NOTE: this call to AC_OUTPUT is really needed; see Automake bug #7635
+# <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=7635>
AC_OUTPUT
END