I've had a long standing TODO to review the RISC-V testsuite regressions from
enabling the late-combine pass (pr116256). I adjusted a few cases months ago,
this adjusts a couple more were it looks like the right thing to do.
All that's left after this are the vls/dup-? tests which regress in meaningful
ways and I'm still investigating reasonable approaches to fix them (they play
into the whole mvconst_internal pattern situation), late-combine isn't doing
anything wrong.
PR target/116256
gcc/testsuite
* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/vlmax_back_prop-37.c: Update expected
output.
* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/vsetvl-15.c: Likewise.
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {vsetvli\s+[a-x0-9]+,\s*zero,\s*e32,\s*mf2,\s*t[au],\s*m[au]} 1 { target { no-opts "-O0" no-opts "-O1" no-opts "-Os" no-opts "-Oz" no-opts "-funroll-loops" no-opts "-g" } } } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {vsetvli\s+[a-x0-9]+,\s*zero,\s*e8,\s*mf8,\s*t[au],\s*m[au]} 1 { target { no-opts "-O0" no-opts "-O1" no-opts "-Os" no-opts "-Oz" no-opts "-funroll-loops" no-opts "-g" } } } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {vsetvli} 2 { target { no-opts "-O0" no-opts "-O1" no-opts "-Os" no-opts "-Oz" no-opts "-funroll-loops" no-opts "-g" } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {vsetvli} 3 { target { no-opts "-O0" no-opts "-O1" no-opts "-Os" no-opts "-Oz" no-opts "-funroll-loops" no-opts "-g" } } } } */
}
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {vsetvli} 3 { target { no-opts "-O0" no-opts "-Os" no-opts "-g" no-opts "-funroll-loops" } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {vsetvli} 2 { target { no-opts "-O0" no-opts "-O1" no-opts "-Os" no-opts "-g" no-opts "-funroll-loops" } } } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {srli\s+[a-x0-9]+,\s*[a-x0-9]+,\s*4} 1 { target { no-opts "-O0" no-opts "-g" no-opts "-funroll-loops" } } } } */