The "comedi_bond" driver allows a composite COMEDI device to be built up
from the subdevices of other COMEDI devices, although it currently only
supports digital I/O subdevices. Although it checks that it is not
trying to bind to itself, it is possible to end up with a cycle of
"comedi_bond" devices bound to each other. For example:
1. Configure /dev/comedi0 to use some COMEDI hardware device with
digital I/O subdevices, but not a "comedi_bond" device.
2. Configure /dev/comedi1 as a "comedi_bond" device bound to
/dev/comedi0.
3. Unconfigure /dev/comedi0 and reconfigure it as a "comedi_bond" device
bound to /dev/comedi1.
Now we have /dev/comedi0 and /dev/comedi1 bound in a cycle. When an
operation is performed on the digital I/O subdevice of /dev/comedi0 for
example, it will try and perform the operation on /dev/comedi1, which
will try and perform the operation on /dev/comedi0. The task will end
up deadlocked trying to lock /dev/comedi0's mutex which it has already
locked.
I discovered that possibility while investigating fix sysbot crash
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=
4a6138c17a47937dcea1 ("possible
deadlock in comedi_do_insn"), but I think that report may be a false
positive.
To avoid that, replace the calls to `comedi_open()` and `comedi_close()`
in "kcomedilib" with calls to `comedi_open_from()` and
`comedi_close_from()`. These take an extra parameter that indicates the
COMEDI minor device number from which the open or close is being
performed. `comedi_open_from()` will refuse to open the device if doing
so would result in a cycle. The cycle detection depends on the extra
parameter having the correct value for this device and also for existing
devices in the chain.
Signed-off-by: Ian Abbott <abbotti@mev.co.uk>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251027153748.4569-3-abbotti@mev.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>