Fix stringop-overflow warning in bug-regex19.c.

Starting with commit
26492c0a14966c32c43cd6ca1d0dca5e62c6cfef
"Annotate additional APIs with GCC attribute access.",
gcc emits this warning on s390x:
In function 'do_one_test',
    inlined from 'do_mb_tests' at bug-regex19.c:385:11:
bug-regex19.c:271:9: error: 're_search' specified size 18446744073709551615 exceeds maximum object size 9223372036854775807 [-Werror=stringop-overflow=]
  271 |   res = re_search (&regbuf, test->string, strlen (test->string),
      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  272 |      test->start, strlen (test->string) - test->start, NULL);
      |      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from ../include/regex.h:2,
                 from bug-regex19.c:22:
bug-regex19.c: In function 'do_mb_tests':
../posix/regex.h:554:17: note: in a call to function 're_search' declared with attribute 'read_only (2, 3)'
  554 | extern regoff_t re_search (struct re_pattern_buffer *__buffer,
      |                 ^~~~~~~~~
...

The function do_one_test is inlined into do_mb_tests on s390x (at least with
gcc 10).  If do_one_test is marked with __attribute__ ((noinline)), there are
no warnings on s390x. If do_one_test is marked with
__attribute__ ((always_inline)), there are the same warnings on x86_64.

test->string points to a variable length array on stack of do_mb_tests
and the content is generated based on the passed test struct.

According to Martin Sebor, this is a false positive caused by the same bug as
the one in nss/makedb.c.  It's fixed in GCC 11 and will also be available in
the next GCC 10.4 release.

diff --git a/posix/bug-regex19.c b/posix/bug-regex19.c
index 9bbffb17e3135eb14a670703c45624df63952fd6..b3fee0a7302c3263a0a1ac4cea0e9a637eb44337 100644 (file)
--- a/posix/bug-regex19.c
+++ b/posix/bug-regex19.c
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
 #include <stdlib.h>
 #include <string.h>
 #include <locale.h>
+#include <libc-diag.h>
 
 #define BRE RE_SYNTAX_POSIX_BASIC
 #define ERE RE_SYNTAX_POSIX_EXTENDED
@@ -268,8 +269,17 @@ do_one_test (const struct test_s *test, const char *fail)
       return 1;
     }
 
+#if __GNUC_PREREQ (10, 0) && !__GNUC_PREREQ (11, 0)
+  DIAG_PUSH_NEEDS_COMMENT;
+  /* Avoid GCC 10 false positive warning: specified size exceeds maximum
+     object size.  */
+  DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (10, "-Wstringop-overflow");
+#endif
   res = re_search (&regbuf, test->string, strlen (test->string),
                   test->start, strlen (test->string) - test->start, NULL);
+#if __GNUC_PREREQ (10, 0) && !__GNUC_PREREQ (11, 0)
+  DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT;
+#endif
   if (res != test->res)
     {
       printf ("%sre_search \"%s\" \"%s\" failed: %d (expected %d)\n",
@@ -280,8 +290,17 @@ do_one_test (const struct test_s *test, const char *fail)
 
   if (test->res > 0 && test->start == 0)
     {
+#if __GNUC_PREREQ (10, 0) && !__GNUC_PREREQ (11, 0)
+  DIAG_PUSH_NEEDS_COMMENT;
+  /* Avoid GCC 10 false positive warning: specified size exceeds maximum
+     object size.  */
+  DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (10, "-Wstringop-overflow");
+#endif
       res = re_search (&regbuf, test->string, strlen (test->string),
                       test->res, strlen (test->string) - test->res, NULL);
+#if __GNUC_PREREQ (10, 0) && !__GNUC_PREREQ (11, 0)
+  DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT;
+#endif
       if (res != test->res)
        {
          printf ("%sre_search from expected \"%s\" \"%s\" failed: %d (expected %d)\n",