My previous change removed an unreachable break; there (an
unreachable continue; would have been more to the point). The
following re-adds a comment explaining that WALK_SUBEXPR_TAIL
does not fall through but tail recurses.
2021-11-30 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
gcc/fortran/
* frontend-passes.c (gfc_expr_walker): Add comment to
indicate tail recursion.
case EXPR_OP:
WALK_SUBEXPR ((*e)->value.op.op1);
WALK_SUBEXPR_TAIL ((*e)->value.op.op2);
+ /* No fallthru because of the tail recursion above. */
case EXPR_FUNCTION:
for (a = (*e)->value.function.actual; a; a = a->next)
WALK_SUBEXPR (a->expr);