jailletc36: is message 010118 still needed? Or at least mitigated with
something like: "for third party proxy module usage only"?
Also, does it require a ap_mmn.h update?
- minfrin: message 010118 toned down, MMN bump updated, clash with r1823482 resolved
- http://svn.apache.org/r1824460
- 2.4.x patch: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/patches/2.4.x/proxy-rfc1035-hostname-v2.diff
ylavic: +1 with s/APLOG_NOTICE/APLOG_INFO/...
+ minfrin: message 010118 toned down, MMN bump updated, clash with r1823482 resolved, s/APLOG_NOTICE/APLOG_INFO/
+ http://svn.apache.org/r1824460
+ http://svn.apache.org/r1824482
+ 2.4.x patch: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/patches/2.4.x/proxy-rfc1035-hostname-v3.diff
*) mpm_queue: Put fdqueue code in common for MPMs event and worker.
trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1821624