+2016-10-24 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
+
+ Backport from trunk
+ PR fortran/61420
+ PR fortran/78013
+ * resolve.c (resolve_variable): Obtain the typespec for a
+ variable expression, when the variable is a function result
+ that is a procedure pointer.
+
2016-10-17 Steven G. Kargl <kargl@gcc.gnu.org>
Backport from trunk
PR fortran/77391
* resolve.c (deferred_requirements): New function to check F2008:C402.
(resolve_fl_variable,resolve_fl_parameter): Use it.
-
+
2016-09-30 Steven G. Kargl <kargl@gcc.gnu.org>
Backport from trunk
subroutine as an actual argument when numeric argument is expected.
2016-09-30 Steven G. Kargl <kargl@gcc.gnu.org>
-
+
Backport of trunk
PR fortran/69867
2016-09-30 Steven G. Kargl <kargl@gcc.gnu.org>
Backport from trunk
-
+
PR fortran/68566
* check.c (gfc_check_reshape): Check for constant expression.
not ICE.
2016-09-30 Steven G. Kargl <kargl@gcc.gnu.org>
-
+
Backport from trunk
PR fortran/70006
Backport from trunk
PR fortran/69514
* array.c (gfc_match_array_constructor): If type-spec is present,
- walk the array constructor performing possible conversions for
+ walk the array constructor performing possible conversions for
numeric types.
2016-09-28 Steven G. Kargl <kargl@gcc.gnu.org>
gfc_reduce_init_expr().
PR fortran/77612
- * decl.c (char_len_param_value): Check parent namespace for
+ * decl.c (char_len_param_value): Check parent namespace for
seen_implicit_none.
2016-09-28 Steven G. Kargl <kargl@gcc.gnu.org>
if (sym->ts.type != BT_UNKNOWN)
gfc_variable_attr (e, &e->ts);
+ else if (sym->attr.flavor == FL_PROCEDURE
+ && sym->attr.function && sym->result
+ && sym->result->ts.type != BT_UNKNOWN
+ && sym->result->attr.proc_pointer)
+ e->ts = sym->result->ts;
else
{
/* Must be a simple variable reference. */
+2016-10-24 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
+
+ Backport from trunk
+ PR fortran/61420
+ PR fortran/78013
+ * gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_49.f90: New test.
+
2016-10-23 Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Backport from mainline
--- /dev/null
+! { dg-do compile }
+!
+! Tests the fix for PRs 78013 and 61420, both of which gave a
+! no IMPLICIT type message for the procedure pointer at assignment.
+!
+module m
+
+ implicit none
+
+ abstract interface
+ function I_f() result( r )
+ real :: r
+ end function I_f
+ end interface
+
+ type, abstract :: a_t
+ private
+ procedure(I_f), nopass, pointer :: m_f => null()
+ contains
+ private
+ procedure, pass(this), public :: f => get_f
+ end type a_t
+
+contains
+
+ function get_f( this ) result( f_ptr ) ! Error message here.
+ class(a_t), intent(in) :: this
+ procedure(I_f), pointer :: f_ptr
+ f_ptr => this%m_f ! Error here :-)
+ end function get_f
+
+end module m
+
+module test
+ implicit none
+
+ type functions
+ contains
+ procedure, nopass :: get_pf => get_it ! Error here
+ end type
+
+ class(functions), allocatable :: f
+
+contains
+
+ function get_it() ! Error message here.
+ procedure (real), pointer :: get_it
+ end function
+
+end module