For selftest bpf_iter/task_vma, I got a failure like below on my qemu run:
test_task_vma_common:FAIL:compare_output unexpected compare_output:
actual
'
561593546000-561593585000r--p0000000000:
241256579534/root/devshare/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs'
!= expected
'
561593546000-561593585000r--p0000000000:
245551546830/root/devshare/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs'
Further debugging found out file->f_inode->i_ino value may exceed 32bit,
e.g., i_ino = 0x14c2eae35, but the format string is '%u'. This caused
inode mismatch between bpf iter and proc result.
Fix the issue by using format string '%llu' to accommodate 64bit i_ino.
Fixes: e8168840e16c ("selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf_iter_task_vma")
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260610051831.1346659-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
bpf_d_path(&file->f_path, d_path_buf, D_PATH_BUF_SIZE);
BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "%08llx ", vma->vm_pgoff << 12);
- BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "%02x:%02x %u", MAJOR(dev), MINOR(dev),
+ BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "%02x:%02x %llu", MAJOR(dev), MINOR(dev),
file->f_inode->i_ino);
BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "\t%s\n", d_path_buf);
} else {