active_fec is a 2-bit unsigned field, and thus can only have the values
0-3. So checking that it is less than 4 is unnecessary.
Simplify the code by dropping this check.
As it no longer fits well where it is, move FEC_MAX_INDEX to towards the
top of the file. And add the prefix OXT2. I believe this is more
idiomatic.
Flagged by Smatch as:
...//otx2_ethtool.c:1024 otx2_get_fecparam() warn: always true condition '(pfvf->linfo.fec < 4) => (0-3 < 4)'
No functional change intended.
Compile tested only.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
Reviewed-by: Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@marvell.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260119-oob-v1-1-a4147e75e770@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
{ "frames", 1 },
};
+#define OTX2_FEC_MAX_INDEX 4
+
static const unsigned int otx2_n_dev_stats = ARRAY_SIZE(otx2_dev_stats);
static const unsigned int otx2_n_drv_stats = ARRAY_SIZE(otx2_drv_stats);
static const unsigned int otx2_n_queue_stats = ARRAY_SIZE(otx2_queue_stats);
ETHTOOL_FEC_BASER,
ETHTOOL_FEC_RS,
ETHTOOL_FEC_BASER | ETHTOOL_FEC_RS};
-#define FEC_MAX_INDEX 4
- if (pfvf->linfo.fec < FEC_MAX_INDEX)
- fecparam->active_fec = fec[pfvf->linfo.fec];
+
+ fecparam->active_fec = fec[pfvf->linfo.fec];
rsp = otx2_get_fwdata(pfvf);
if (IS_ERR(rsp))
return PTR_ERR(rsp);
- if (rsp->fwdata.supported_fec < FEC_MAX_INDEX) {
+ if (rsp->fwdata.supported_fec < OTX2_FEC_MAX_INDEX) {
if (!rsp->fwdata.supported_fec)
fecparam->fec = ETHTOOL_FEC_NONE;
else