When the sides of ?: are class prvalues, we wrap the COND_EXPR in a
TARGET_EXPR so that both sides will initialize the same temporary. But in
this case we were stripping the outer TARGET_EXPR and conditionally creating
different temporaries, unnecessarily using extra stack. The
recently added TARGET_EXPR_NO_ELIDE flag avoids this.
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* call.cc (build_conditional_expr): Set TARGET_EXPR_NO_ELIDE on the
outer TARGET_EXPR.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/tree-ssa/cond-temp1.C: New test.
but now we sometimes wrap them in NOP_EXPRs so the test would
fail. */
if (CLASS_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (result)))
- result = get_target_expr (result, complain);
+ {
+ result = get_target_expr (result, complain);
+ /* Tell gimplify_modify_expr_rhs not to strip this in
+ assignment context: we want both arms to initialize
+ the same temporary. */
+ TARGET_EXPR_NO_ELIDE (result) = true;
+ }
/* If this expression is an rvalue, but might be mistaken for an
lvalue, we must add a NON_LVALUE_EXPR. */
result = rvalue (result);
--- /dev/null
+// Test that the ?: only creates one temporary.
+// { dg-additional-options "-fdump-tree-gimple" }
+// { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "struct A" 2 "gimple" } }
+
+struct A
+{
+ int i;
+ A(int);
+};
+
+bool b;
+int main()
+{
+ A a = 1;
+ a = b ? A(2) : A(3);
+}